Posts Tagged ‘PFP’

Jan Tucker’s November 2, 2010 California Endorsements & Recommendations

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

California Ballot Endorsements by the “FACTION”

“FACTION” stands for “Friends And Cohorts of Tucker Independently Organizing Nationally.” It is my tongue-in-cheek, semi-Stalinist “Cult of Personality,” through which my friends (and cohorts) and I conduct our political operations in the electoral sphere. The following thoughts, recommendations and endorsements are for the California Ballot for the November 2, 2010 election.

Governor—Other than my view that electing Meg Whitman would portend a disaster for California, I’m not even considering voting for Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown, Jr. His father, “Pat” Brown, was a great governor assuming that one ignores his ties to the Chicago mob’s boys in California. But Jerry demonstrated throughout his career that he’s more interested in hyping his purported achievements in the media than he is in governing. When he was Secretary of State, he transferred so many employees to the P.R. office the real work of the office got slower and slower and practically to a standstill.

Jerry Brown (L) Jan B. Tucker (R)

I sued Jerry when he was Secretary of State and got an injunction against enforcement of the filing fees from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which were then mandatory for all candidates regardless of whether they were wealthy, working class, or indigent, to run for office. A conservative Democrat, Ray Choate, also had an injunction against them in Northern California. The day after the U.S. Supreme Court in Lubin vs. Panish unanimously declared California’s electoral filing fees to be unconstitutional, Jerry threw five (5) candidates off the ballot, including Peace & Freedom Party candidates Robert Donovan (Attorney General), Bernie Klitzner (Controller), and Jim Stanbery (Treasurer) off the ballot for not paying the unconstitutional fees.

While serving as California Attorney General, he has allowed Deputy Attorney General Phillip Scott Chan to persecute the California League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) – tacitly assisting a LULAC member who is Chair of the California Democratic Party’s Chicano – Latino Caucus to assist a Republican Party takeover attempt of National LULAC – while ignoring complaints that she herself unlawfully ran a suspended corporation during her four (4) years as LULAC State Director.

Carlos Alvarez

So, I am voting without hesitation for CARLOS ALVAREZ, the Peace & Freedom Party candidate for Governor. Carlos is an activist with the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). While I have disagreements with the PSL on some policy issues, they have always told me to my face when and why they disagree, unlike the Feiginite and Berkeley Bolshevik leadership cult of PFP who lied and backstabbed on foreign policy issues relating to Armenia (more about that later).

Lieutenant Governor—I am dual endorsing GAVIN NEWSOM (Democrat) and C.T. WEBER (PFP). While I would have much preferred Matt Gonzalez as Mayor of San Francisco, I admire Newsom’s unequivocal support for same sex marriage rights and his reorganization of San Francisco’s health care delivery system. C.T. has a long history of organizing and struggle on many causes and has at times been an outsider from the cabal that tends to hang onto power in PFP by keeping it cult-like. Hopefully his leadership in PFP will make the organization the independent, radical, and inclusive organization that it once was and which it purports to be.

C.T. Weber

Mayor Gavin Newsom 10-5-09


Marylou Cabral

Secretary of State—Again, MARYLOU CABRAL (PFP) is a PSL member running on the PFP ticket. Debra Bowen to her credit is prosecuting Larry “Nativo” Lopez for voter fraud (it would be more interesting if the State would look into all the non-profit corporations he has left suspended and bankrupt) but when she was a state senator, she had a penchant for trying to ban and criminalize standard and legitimate private investigator practices that are necessary to enforce the rights to criminal defendants and other litigants to due process of law and equal protection.

Karen Martinez

State ControllerKAREN MARTINEZ (PFP). Controller is a race that frequently helps keep PFP on the ballot and with recent changes in election laws, that may be imperative to insure that working people have a way to participate in elections and debate the issues.

Debra Reiger

Charles "Kit" Crittenden

State Treasurer—Dual endorsement: DEBRA REIGER (PFP) and CHARLES “KIT” CRITTENDEN (Green). Debra is one of the more sensible people in PFP. At CSU Northridge where he taught, we used to call retired Philosophy Professor Crittenden “Crito.” It was an in-joke with those of us who were studying ancient Greek philosophy.

Attorney General—KAMALA HARRIS (Democratic). PFP candidate Robert J. Evans is guilty of Feiginism and Berkeley Bolshevism (for details on what these ultra-sectarian disputes are all about, email me privately). In 1994, Evans (along with Senate candidate Marsha Feinland) took park in an Alice in Wonderland-like telephonic PFP State Executive Committee meeting which resulted in PFP taking a position that effectively meant that Armenia should be punished with sanctions for the crime of having been blockaded by Turkey and Azerbaijan. This was a position to the right of the Turkish Embassy and Dick Cheney (who was the recipient of the Azeri-American Chamber of Commerce “Freedom Support” award). Evans later denied that he knew anything about this position (I didn’t believe him when he made that claim in 1998 and I don’t believe it now). Evans is so sectarian that I could see him wince when PFP adopted a part of my proposed 1978 platform on breaking up large agricultural holdings with redistribution to small family farmers and farm workers. I guess his consternation at the proposal was that this was part of Lenin’s “New Economic Program” which was dismantled when Stalin collectivized agriculture (more to Evans liking I guess).

KAMALA HARRIS’s election is imperative because LGBTI rights are not trivial and same-sex marriage is a very important issue. Harris will not appeal decisions striking down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional; Republican Steve Cooley is committed to doing so.

United States Senate—BARBARA BOXER has her faults. But when she was in the House of Representatives my NOW Chapter (San Fernando Valley/Northeast Los Angeles) gave her a big boost featuring her at our “Rally in the Valley” in 1992 shortly after she made a big push to get funding for abortion for rape and incest victims. Reproductive rights are front and center of many “culture war” election issues throughout the country these days and Boxer is always on the correct side of the issue.

That said, in some ways she exemplifies what Newspaper Guild founder Heywood Campbell Broun was talking about when he said that “A liberal is one who leaves the room when the fight begins.” When she was up for re-election years ago, at a gathering in a private residence I found myself standing next to Actor David Clennon. He asked Boxer, “what about Palestinian rights?”

Boxer launched into a long and belabored explanation of why Israel was created, including the horrors of the World War II Holocaust. At the end she finally said, “…and Palestinian rights? Of course! Of course!” Weeelllllll, I’m not sure what rights and how they are supposed to get them, about which Boxer said nothing.

As to Feinland though, as pointed out earlier she was part of the cabal that voted to have Armenia sanctioned, in spite of the knowledge I had presented on the issue to the PFP leadership that: (a) just before the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Azeri mobs raped, pillaged, and drove out around 800,000 ethnic Armenians in old fashioned pogroms, (b) unlawfully and unilaterally stripped a 90% ethnic Armenian region of its autonomy when Azerbaijan declared independence from the Soviet Union, and (c) blockaded the formerly autonomous region (Nagorno-Karabakh) and Armenia itself, leading to the death of about 1% of the Armenian population through cold alone in a single year. As pointed out, this puts her to the right of Dick Cheney, and that is really difficult to achieve on almost any issue.

BALLOT PROPOSITIONS

No. 19: YES

No. 20: Yes

No. 21: Yes

No. 22: No

No. 23: No

No. 24: Yes

No. 25: Yes

No. 26: No

No. 27: No


Small World reminder @ the Autry Museum: Siqueiros exhibition

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

David Alfaro Siqueiros

I spent some time Saturday at the David Alfaro Siqueiros exhibit at the Autry Museum. It’s a great exhibition of his art and that of related artists and photographers. The exhibition is entitled “Siqueiros in Los Angeles: Censorship Defied” and runs through January 9, 2011.

One of the things that intrigued me most was that I hadn’t known that Siqueiros was a friend of photographer Edward Henry Weston. I’ve seen extensive exhibits of Weston’s work at LACMA (Los Angeles County Museum of Art) and when I did, I spied a nude on a Mexican beach of a then young and beautiful woman. I recognized her as Carol Weston, an old friend, and one of Weston’s ex-wives.

Edward Henry Weston

Carol Weston had been born to missionary parents in the Phillipines. She became active in radical politics and I met her as one of the longtime founders and stalwarts in the California Peace and Freedom Party. I smile now thinking of Carol for as old as she was, she always kept an open mind on cultural issues; I remember her denouncing Maggie Phair, the chief of the Feiginite school of thought amongst the PFP leadership, for being so conservative in her opposition to complete legalization of marijuana.

Carol Weston was always doing the basic grunt-work of PFP. She was constantly out registering voters. One time while registering random voters in Hollywood, she wound up signing up actor/comedian Wally Cox in the Peace and Freedom Party.

Dr. Benjamin Spock with Carol Weston, 1976 during Spock's run for Vice-President with PFP/People's Party candidate Margaret Wright for Presiden

Once, Carol approached me at a PFP meeting and asked me if I’d been on the Sam Yorty show, then on Los Angeles television Channel 13. I was running for Lieutenant Governor that year, 1978, on the PFP ticket. She told me that her next door neighbor was a member of the John Birch Society and that they’d been arguing about politics for the past 40 years on every issue. But after seeing me espouse my radical brand of politics in down to Earth ways that anybody could understand, her neighbor had said that she’d seen this fine young gentlemen on the Sam Yorty show and that he’d been so intelligent and so patriotic that she was going to join Carol that year in voting the straight Peace and Freedom Party ticket.

I also had the distinct honor and pleasure of meeting Carol’s brother. I forget his name but he was also a PFP member and when I wound up getting his signature to get me on the ballot in 1978, I learned that he was a renowned muralist and sculptor. As I later that year took on the job of Southern California Public Relations Director for the Arizona Farmworkers union, we wound up arranging for him to go to El Mirage, Arizona, and create a gigantic mural for the AFW’s office.

And so it goes. Will wonders never cease?


Plagiarizing Dr. Spock

Friday, October 1st, 2010

Dr. Benjamin Spock: 1972 Presidential Candidate, "More committed to the next generation than to the next election"

In today’s press conference at the White House the administration alluded to a theme of being more committed to the next generation than to the next election. President Obama used that slogan in a speech a few days ago as well. He’s not the first to use Dr. Benjamin Spock’s 1972 presidential campaign slogan when he ran on the Peace and Freedom Party ticket (nationally with the People’s Party) that year.

Ronald Reagan utilized that campaign slogan, “More committed to the next generation than to the next election” when he ran for president as well.

In 1972, I was the youngest delegate to the People’s Party national convention in St. Louis at the Gateway Hotel. Later I got Dr. Spock to campaign — with Secret Service bodyguards — at U.S. Grant High School in the San Fernando Valley, an event that my classmates remember to this day.

Dr. Benjamin Spock with District Attorney candidate Marge Buckley, 1972


Die Gedanken Sind Frei

Friday, October 1st, 2010

In 1996 I ran for the Peace and Freedom Party’s nomination for President. I placed second (2nd) out of four (4) candidates, edging out the candidate that the party’s leadership was promoting and trouncing the Socialist Party USA’s nominee. Just ran across some of my campaign memorabilia which reminded me why the arts are so important in creating and influencing social and political values. It’s the “Musical Campaign Platform” I created when appearing at a “Rock the Vote” in Burbank, CA. Here are the songs that illustrate what I think, what I feel and what I do, politically:

“Labor Donated” Isn’t Subject to Re-definition

Sunday, September 5th, 2010

A discussion is taking place in Peace and Freedom Party cyber-circles as to whether it is legitimate for their candidates to use the terminology “Labor Donated” on their literature.

I used to be the investigator for the Southern California Allied Printing Trades Council and for Graphic Communications International Union District Council 2, which takes in the entire Western United States from the Mexican border to the Canadian border. I also served in capacities with Local 69 of the Newspaper Guild up to and including First Vice President under two presidents. As far as I know, Local 69 was the only Guild local member of an Allied Printing Trades Council.

The term “labor donated” is not subject to interpretation by left wing organizations who want to pretend that they are being politically correct when they don’t utilize a legitimate union label print shop. For the most part, and I emphasize that there are exceptions for some locals and some Allied Councils that are corrupt, the only legitimate union labels for leaflets are GCIU and Allied Printing Trades Council labels. Although you may find print shops that have UAW, IWW, or even Iron Workers labels (for examples), that doesn’t mean they’re considered legitimate or that they should be. The UAW labels started cropping up after the GCIU won an election and a GCIU official turned down a bribe for a substandard contract in Sacramento. Next thing you know, a corrupt UAW local signed the precise substandard contract that the honest GCIU official turned down.

IWW shops — which tend to operate as collectives — have wages and working conditions that undermine legitimate, standard GCIU contracts (GCIU is now part of the Teamsters and has tens of thousands of printer members as opposed to the International Typographical Union which is part of CWA, and which has considerably shrunk from its days of glory).

The bottom line is, printers don’t make cars and put Allied labels on them; the UAW shouldn’t print and put automobile labels on printing. There are legitimate reasons for keeping jurisdictions like that separate based on trade, in spite of left rhetoric about having “one big union” or “industrial” all inclusive unions. Simply put, a union with a larger segment of a particular industry under contract can get a better contract, not to mention that they will know the ins and outs of the industry’s wage, benefit, and working conditions structure at the negotiating table.

The terminology “labor donated” applies to a piece of paper that has been produced at a union shop under contract in which the workers at the shop donated their labor. Nothing less. That means that it has been fabricated to end product by union labor. You cannot get an Allied Printing Trades Union label approved unless your shop is wall to wall union under contract. “Labor donated” is a term that was invented by and defined by the printing trades.

Just because somebody tells an anecdote about some printing trades official somewhere authorizing a deviation from this accepted usage and practice doesn’t make it legitimate. That union officer should be brought up on charges for violating Allied Printing Trades rules, which govern the usage of the label as a federally registered trademark and for breaching fiduciary duties to the union’s members.

The way to be honest about printing’s source when it is not printed by legitimate printing union members under legitimate contracts from beginning to end is to label it “self printed” or “computer generated” or something along those lines. That will not imply to printing union represented members that their fellow unionists donated their labor when that is not the case.


Konversations With Kevin (Kevin D. Akin) #4

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

This is another in my series of anecdotes about the California State Chair of the Peace & Freedom Party, Kevin Akin.

This piece is based upon past conversations I had with the late Mike Noonan, a long time stalwart of PFP and many other political struggles. Mike had been a member of the same sub-unit of another political party with Kevin at one time because they lived in roughly the same geographical area. This at times led to his being a guest in Kevin’s abode.

Mike considered the living conditions there to be a source of questions, like the food and bedding available to younger members of the household in years gone by. Whenever outsiders questioned these goings on, according to Mike, they were told that it was none of their business….so outside the family, it became a source of gossip. So my public question to Kevin is, what exactly was going on that seemed to raise Mike and other people’s eyebrows?

Konversations with Kevin #3 (Kevin D. Akin)

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

This is the third in my series regarding Kevin Akin, State Chair of the Peace and Freedom Party.

Sometime ago, Kevin circulated accusations about my supposedly being incompetent as an investigator based upon his having read a California appellate decision that mentioned a declaration I had written at the behest of an attorney. Bottom line is, the court didn’t view it as helping the attorney’s case.

The declaration didn’t help the attorney’s case. He used it in spite of his efforts to get me to change it so that it would help his case; I refused because what he would have liked me to say wouldn’t have been the truth. Of course, Kevin didn’t do any due diligence to determine what the facts were that lay in the backstory of the court case.

More recently, Kevin has been at it again. Since he’s convinced that he’s a reliable judge of the truth and a painstaking researcher or investigator of the facts, he thinks that I have supposedly used aliases to malign people (not true; whenever I malign people I do so openly under my own name) and that my condemnation of Bill Callison on this blog site for sexually harassing Kayren Hudiburgh (one of Kevin’s predecessors as Chair of the PFP) was outrageous and disgusting.

So, since Kevin has such a high opinion of his abilities, I’ll throw him a couple of cases to check out on current PFP candidates who have engaged in far more egregious behavior than I’m accused of and see if he can track down the facts:

1. One PFP candidate he’s supporting this year was an elected official with jurisdiction over residential rental units. This person’s spouse, while actually living with the candidate, was in fact unlawfully subletting their community property rental unit in violation of rent control ordinances;

2. Another PFP candidate he’s supporting this year once signed a declaration under penalty of perjury in a past election for a state legislative seat when somebody else had in fact gotten the signatures (don’t worry too much, because the statute of limitations has probably run out by now).

So Kevin, I’m throwing down the gauntlet to see how well you do at figuring out who did these egregious acts since you seem to think so much about your investigative skills. By the way Kevin, you should have considered that in PFP, I know where all the bodies are buried. As is said about me in the investigative industry, I know where all the bodies were buried because I was either on the burial detail, or else I had it under surveillance…..

British Election Results: 1 in 20 Have Gone Neo-Nazi

Saturday, May 8th, 2010

In case people missed this little asterisk on the British election results, a full 5% — in raw numbers just under 1.5 million Britons — voted for the United Kingdom Independence Party and the British National Party. These parties are the spiritual descendants of Sir Oswald Mosley’s pro-Nazi movement and try to maintain a polite veneer of supposedly being non-racist enough to meet the qualifications of parties to run in British elections.

This poses a BIG problem for electoral reform in Britain.

One thing that is a must for either the Conservative or Labour parties to come to power in a coalition government is to get the support of the Liberal Democrats. There is simply no other possible coalition formula that doesn’t include them, and the Lib-Dem bottom line is going to include some form of proportional representation or electoral arrangement that enables them to reflect with parliamentary seats a closer measure of the votes they actually get.

Many “list” systems of straight proportional representation systems that nations use also have a minimum proportion necessary for a party to receive any seats at all. If I recall correctly, Germany has a 5% minimum threshold. If Britain went to a system like that, an electoral alliance between the BNP, UKIP and other far-right groups looks like they could easily attain a 5% threshold, inasmuch as they just did it standing on their own.

What the Lib-Dems and the Labour Party might want to agree on as a method of keeping the Nazis out of parliament while still instilling fairness to the system would be a French type of system, where there are two rounds of elections with every party able to participate. What happens in effect in France is that after the first round, whoever came out on the left with the best chance of winning and whoever on the right has the best chance of winning goes on to the second round, with the other parties that they can align themselves with dropping out of the race.

This latter type of election is similar to what some Labour Party cabinet members were already suggesting de facto, when in the last days before the election they openly promoted “strategic voting,” urging their own members to vote Liberal Democratic where that party was the best chance of beating the Conservative candidates and imploring Liberal Democratic voters to vote Labour where their candidates, likewise, were in a better position against the Conservatives.

No matter how you configure election rules, somebody will get and advantage and somebody will lose an advantage. When California used, for a couple of elections, an open primary system, I was the hands down primary winner against the leadership of my own party, the Peace and Freedom Party. I set the all-time high vote record for the PFP primary for any candidate for any office in any election in history. Partially as a result, PFP’s leadership teamed up with the Democrats and Republicans to challenge the open primary in court. They got rid of the Open Primary, which was immensely popular with California’s voters, but they are stuck with the fact that I will now always hold the high primary vote record as long as we have a closed primary.