Posts Tagged ‘LULAC’

Jan Tucker’s November 2, 2010 California Endorsements & Recommendations

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

California Ballot Endorsements by the “FACTION”

“FACTION” stands for “Friends And Cohorts of Tucker Independently Organizing Nationally.” It is my tongue-in-cheek, semi-Stalinist “Cult of Personality,” through which my friends (and cohorts) and I conduct our political operations in the electoral sphere. The following thoughts, recommendations and endorsements are for the California Ballot for the November 2, 2010 election.

Governor—Other than my view that electing Meg Whitman would portend a disaster for California, I’m not even considering voting for Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown, Jr. His father, “Pat” Brown, was a great governor assuming that one ignores his ties to the Chicago mob’s boys in California. But Jerry demonstrated throughout his career that he’s more interested in hyping his purported achievements in the media than he is in governing. When he was Secretary of State, he transferred so many employees to the P.R. office the real work of the office got slower and slower and practically to a standstill.

Jerry Brown (L) Jan B. Tucker (R)

I sued Jerry when he was Secretary of State and got an injunction against enforcement of the filing fees from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which were then mandatory for all candidates regardless of whether they were wealthy, working class, or indigent, to run for office. A conservative Democrat, Ray Choate, also had an injunction against them in Northern California. The day after the U.S. Supreme Court in Lubin vs. Panish unanimously declared California’s electoral filing fees to be unconstitutional, Jerry threw five (5) candidates off the ballot, including Peace & Freedom Party candidates Robert Donovan (Attorney General), Bernie Klitzner (Controller), and Jim Stanbery (Treasurer) off the ballot for not paying the unconstitutional fees.

While serving as California Attorney General, he has allowed Deputy Attorney General Phillip Scott Chan to persecute the California League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) – tacitly assisting a LULAC member who is Chair of the California Democratic Party’s Chicano – Latino Caucus to assist a Republican Party takeover attempt of National LULAC – while ignoring complaints that she herself unlawfully ran a suspended corporation during her four (4) years as LULAC State Director.

Carlos Alvarez

So, I am voting without hesitation for CARLOS ALVAREZ, the Peace & Freedom Party candidate for Governor. Carlos is an activist with the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). While I have disagreements with the PSL on some policy issues, they have always told me to my face when and why they disagree, unlike the Feiginite and Berkeley Bolshevik leadership cult of PFP who lied and backstabbed on foreign policy issues relating to Armenia (more about that later).

Lieutenant Governor—I am dual endorsing GAVIN NEWSOM (Democrat) and C.T. WEBER (PFP). While I would have much preferred Matt Gonzalez as Mayor of San Francisco, I admire Newsom’s unequivocal support for same sex marriage rights and his reorganization of San Francisco’s health care delivery system. C.T. has a long history of organizing and struggle on many causes and has at times been an outsider from the cabal that tends to hang onto power in PFP by keeping it cult-like. Hopefully his leadership in PFP will make the organization the independent, radical, and inclusive organization that it once was and which it purports to be.

C.T. Weber

Mayor Gavin Newsom 10-5-09


Marylou Cabral

Secretary of State—Again, MARYLOU CABRAL (PFP) is a PSL member running on the PFP ticket. Debra Bowen to her credit is prosecuting Larry “Nativo” Lopez for voter fraud (it would be more interesting if the State would look into all the non-profit corporations he has left suspended and bankrupt) but when she was a state senator, she had a penchant for trying to ban and criminalize standard and legitimate private investigator practices that are necessary to enforce the rights to criminal defendants and other litigants to due process of law and equal protection.

Karen Martinez

State ControllerKAREN MARTINEZ (PFP). Controller is a race that frequently helps keep PFP on the ballot and with recent changes in election laws, that may be imperative to insure that working people have a way to participate in elections and debate the issues.

Debra Reiger

Charles "Kit" Crittenden

State Treasurer—Dual endorsement: DEBRA REIGER (PFP) and CHARLES “KIT” CRITTENDEN (Green). Debra is one of the more sensible people in PFP. At CSU Northridge where he taught, we used to call retired Philosophy Professor Crittenden “Crito.” It was an in-joke with those of us who were studying ancient Greek philosophy.

Attorney General—KAMALA HARRIS (Democratic). PFP candidate Robert J. Evans is guilty of Feiginism and Berkeley Bolshevism (for details on what these ultra-sectarian disputes are all about, email me privately). In 1994, Evans (along with Senate candidate Marsha Feinland) took park in an Alice in Wonderland-like telephonic PFP State Executive Committee meeting which resulted in PFP taking a position that effectively meant that Armenia should be punished with sanctions for the crime of having been blockaded by Turkey and Azerbaijan. This was a position to the right of the Turkish Embassy and Dick Cheney (who was the recipient of the Azeri-American Chamber of Commerce “Freedom Support” award). Evans later denied that he knew anything about this position (I didn’t believe him when he made that claim in 1998 and I don’t believe it now). Evans is so sectarian that I could see him wince when PFP adopted a part of my proposed 1978 platform on breaking up large agricultural holdings with redistribution to small family farmers and farm workers. I guess his consternation at the proposal was that this was part of Lenin’s “New Economic Program” which was dismantled when Stalin collectivized agriculture (more to Evans liking I guess).

KAMALA HARRIS’s election is imperative because LGBTI rights are not trivial and same-sex marriage is a very important issue. Harris will not appeal decisions striking down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional; Republican Steve Cooley is committed to doing so.

United States Senate—BARBARA BOXER has her faults. But when she was in the House of Representatives my NOW Chapter (San Fernando Valley/Northeast Los Angeles) gave her a big boost featuring her at our “Rally in the Valley” in 1992 shortly after she made a big push to get funding for abortion for rape and incest victims. Reproductive rights are front and center of many “culture war” election issues throughout the country these days and Boxer is always on the correct side of the issue.

That said, in some ways she exemplifies what Newspaper Guild founder Heywood Campbell Broun was talking about when he said that “A liberal is one who leaves the room when the fight begins.” When she was up for re-election years ago, at a gathering in a private residence I found myself standing next to Actor David Clennon. He asked Boxer, “what about Palestinian rights?”

Boxer launched into a long and belabored explanation of why Israel was created, including the horrors of the World War II Holocaust. At the end she finally said, “…and Palestinian rights? Of course! Of course!” Weeelllllll, I’m not sure what rights and how they are supposed to get them, about which Boxer said nothing.

As to Feinland though, as pointed out earlier she was part of the cabal that voted to have Armenia sanctioned, in spite of the knowledge I had presented on the issue to the PFP leadership that: (a) just before the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Azeri mobs raped, pillaged, and drove out around 800,000 ethnic Armenians in old fashioned pogroms, (b) unlawfully and unilaterally stripped a 90% ethnic Armenian region of its autonomy when Azerbaijan declared independence from the Soviet Union, and (c) blockaded the formerly autonomous region (Nagorno-Karabakh) and Armenia itself, leading to the death of about 1% of the Armenian population through cold alone in a single year. As pointed out, this puts her to the right of Dick Cheney, and that is really difficult to achieve on almost any issue.

BALLOT PROPOSITIONS

No. 19: YES

No. 20: Yes

No. 21: Yes

No. 22: No

No. 23: No

No. 24: Yes

No. 25: Yes

No. 26: No

No. 27: No


Federalist No. 10: Why it’s important for my PI colleagues to understand how democracy works

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

In a January 3, 2010 letter about me nominating me for CALI’s Distinguished Achievement Award, 53 year career private eye Eddie McClain wrote in pertinent part, “He has also been an effective advocate for the association and profession as a key member of the CALI Legislative Committee. As an active member of alternative organizations such as NOW, LULAC and the NAACP, he often persuades those organizations to support CALI bills or oppose unfavorable legislation detrimental to our fact-finding mission.”

James Madison

This aspect of what I do for the California Association of Licensed Investigators and my profession bears some explanation because it is an important lesson for how democracy is supposed to work in America for interest groups. James Madison spelled it out in the Federalist Papers, in Federalist No. 10, writing as “Publius.”

According to Madison, a threat to democracy exists when large factions contend against one another. When one comes to power as a large faction, there is an inherent danger of dictatorship and authoritarian rule. To counter this, each small faction contends with other small factions and makes alliances with other small factions to create temporary majorities to pass or defeat legislation and to otherwise influence government policies and practices.

I make no secret of the fact that my overall world viewpoint is on the left. For one of the best explanations of what is meant by left and right, read Ideology and Utopia by Karl Mannheim. I eschew the term “liberal” for myself. As Heywood Campbell Broun, founder of The Newspaper Guild (AFL-CIO, CLC, CWA) once wrote, “a liberal is one who leaves the room when the fight begins.” I am a radical, just as that term might have been meant when Karl Hess wrote and Barry Goldwater said, “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.”

CALI and the private investigative industry as a whole, needs its members who are Democrats or Republicans, Libertarians, or Greens, or like me, members of the Peace and Freedom Party, in order to make the temporary or even long range strategic alliances that enable us to be effective advocates for our profession when sculpting legislative and governmental policies. What I bring to the table in CALI, and in the National Organization for Women, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, League of United Latin American Citizens, and the trade union movement, is the ability to perceive where these organizations on an issue by issue basis have interests in common. That enables us to come together to oppose bills or support them when they will be detrimental to our interests or will advance our interests, respectively.

Then, there are the people who obviously don’t understand Federalist No. 10 and how democracy works in America or if they do, they have some self-destructive need to damage the long term prospects for legislative success for CALI and private investigators. Take the cabal of Rick Von Geldern, David Herrera, Ed Saucerman, and others who resorted to any tactic and proceeded motor-mouthed to either denounce the entire legislature as “whores” or who ratified the conduct of those who did.

One of the things they used in their battle against Mandatory Continuing Education (MCE) for private investigators was to vilify me and attempt character assassination by denouncing my ties to civil rights organizations as though they were inherently unsavory. Note of course that nobody in the profession was upset when I got several NOW chapters to oppose SB 208 because of the effect it would have had on sexual harassment and discrimination cases in the workplace. But when it came to their supporting MCE, all of a sudden I was accused with unabashed sexist language of “hiding behind the skirts of NOW.” I was also bashed with thinly veiled racist attacks against my affiliations with LULAC.

Did this cabal of miscreants care whether that kind of rhetoric might damage the long term interests of private investigators. It probably never even occurred to them. Which is precisely why it was lunacy for David Herrera to appoint Rick Von Geldern as legislative director for PICA (Professional Investigators of California) and for Ed Saucerman to sing Rick’s praises as though he was some kind of genius legislative tactician and strategist.

So, if they actually are literate enough to read and understand it. They should start their own voluntary continuing education by reading Federalist No. 10.


More Movidas in LULAC

Saturday, July 17th, 2010

This is one of the most incredible scenarios I’ve ever seen. Just got a report from LULAC’s National Convention (League of United Latin American Citizens) in Albuquerque. I’m really glad I didn’t go. I’ve been suffering from various stress related ailments and if I were there I’d be way stressed out.

Here’s the background. In order to take disciplinary action in LULAC there needs to be a vote by the National Executive Board. Without any such vote, LULAC National Legal Advisor — who dubs himself general counsel — arbitrarily suspended two officers of LULAC. He does it in an email that conveniently winds up in the hands of the political opponents of the two LULAC officers before they even are aware of it and doesn’t even bother to send it to the one that it specifically attacks.

So, Luis Roberto Vera, Jr., the attorney, gets named as an individual defendant in a lawsuit that was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on July 14, 2010, Case No. BC 441643, Luevano vs Diaz et al. One would think that once he knew he was personally named as a defendant, along with National LULAC, he would step aside and recuse himself from any dealings with the people that are suing him for, amongst other things, Libel per se and Invasion of Privacy. But NOOOOO! He’s right there now at the convention telling people what to do vis a vis figuring out ways to disqualify the people that are suing him from acting as delegates to the convention and running for office.

I wonder what the Texas State Bar Association will say about this state of affairs?

You can see the lawsuit (which will likely be amended as soon as the Plaintiffs are back in town) at:

http://www.janbtucker.com/Cases-In-Progress.html

“Movidas,” “Mishagas,” and “Nigashit” all at once

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

On May 23, 2010 I served as parliamentarian during the election convention of the California League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). LULAC is the nation’s oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization.

In my own community (Jewish) we have the term “mishagas” to refer to intrigue and infighting in families or other forms of social organization. Amongst African-Americans, a term which fundamentally means the same thing is “Nigashit.” In the Latino community, the best term for the concept is “movidas.”

In all the years and all the organizations I’ve worked with, I have never seen a situation with so many individuals and factions that are constantly-I mean CONSTANTLY-engaged in movidas against all the other rival individuals and factions. What’s so unique about it is that from election to election, meeting to meeting, the various factions keep changing sides and alliances. Case in point: about seven years ago, at my very first board meeting of California LULAC, the immediate past state director leveled a denunciation of a former state director that fundamentally insinuated that he had embezzled funds. Now, years later, they find themselves on the same side, because they apparently decided that they hated the incumbent administration of LULAC more than they hate each other.

Anyway, one faction shows up with fees for 40 delegates paid by one individual by corporate check. This block of delegates becomes the kingmaker and keeps changing sides from moment to moment. As a result of this “jefe” changing sides and telling his delegates how to vote, he winds up not being elected to anything he ran for personally. So what happens after the election: he puts a “stop-payment” on the check that paid the delegate fees for the 40 kingmaking delegates.

So of course, I’m in the middle of all this. As parliamentarian I’ve had to rule it like I see it. Those delegates didn’t have the right to vote at the convention. The election for officers is null and void because those votes made the difference between winners and losers. So, no matter how honest and accurate a parliamentary call I’ve made, I know that I’m a lightning rod to be attacked with a combination of movidas, mishagas, and nigashit all wrapped up into one.

Revolt in Littlerock California-County Nuisance Abatement Team uses Gestapo Tactics against the elderly

Friday, May 14th, 2010

The Los Angeles County Nuisance Abatement Team (NAT) and the County Sheriffs Department have provoked a revolt by the residents of the unincorporated community of Littlerock, California in the Antelope Valley. The residents of Littlerock and other unincorporated communities are alleging that they have been subjected to Gestapo tactics in the county’s zeal to generate revenues from fines and seizures of homes and other property for auction.

The Littlerock Town Council estimates that approximately 25% of the homes in their communities have been subjected to enforcement actions over county ordinance violations. Residents report that the NAT tells them that if something on their property isn’t expressly allowed by law then they have the discretion to force them to get rid of it. One example is that an NAT agent ordered a man to remove a bottle from the hood of a car he had parked on his property (he was leaving it in the sun to change its color for artistic purposes).

One elderly woman in a wheel chair was accosted by NAT agents accompanied by armed sheriffs with a search warrant. She says a gun was put to her head.

The search warrants issued over what amounts to the lowest level of “crime,” county ordinance violations that deal with the community aesthetics of an “agricultural zone,” were issued based upon a claim that the Littlerock Town Council itself made the initial complaints to county authorities. But a resolution passed by the Council and announced last night to the public repudiates this and alleges that there are no minutes or records of any purported action or resolution of the Council to ask the County for enforcement actions. The resolution, which you can find at http://www.calulac.org or http://www.janbtucker.com/IdeaOpinions.html spells out just how outrageous the county’s actions have been and demands federal intervention by the Civil Rights Divisions of the FBI, the U.S. Department of Justice and calls upon the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) for assistance.

I spoke on the civil and constitutional rights ramifications of what was going on before the Council and residents last night. Click the following link to hear my speech: Littlerock CA 5-13-10

Fascism coming to America?

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Governor Huey P. Long of Louisiana once warned that “If fascism came to America, it would come on a program of Americanism.” If anybody has any doubt that SB 1070 of Arizona and other draconian measures people keep proposing about so-called “illegal aliens” is any different from the way that Jews, Gypsies, and political refugees from the Nazis were treated in pre-World War II Europe, they should read Erich Maria Remarque’s book, Flotsam. Anyway, these are the responses that I am proposing for how LULAC (of which I am a national civil rights commissioner) and other civil rights organizations should respond to the passage of SB 1070. This is from a memo I just fired off to some top level LULAC people:

Jews forced to wear Yellow Star of David

1. In World War II, on the day that had been decreed by the Nazis for the Jews of Denmark to wear Yellow Stars of David on their clothing so that they could be singled out and identified, the King of Denmark took his morning horse ride wearing a Yellow Star of David himself. By that afternoon, the King’s message to the Danish people resulted in every Dane who was not a Nazi and a traitor wearing the Yellow Star of David. This act of civil disobedience made it impossible to implement the law.

LULAC calls on all Arizonans and everybody visiting the state to wear a Yellow Star of David in protest against the law with the word’s “undocumented immigrant to Arizona” written on it. It will throw a big monkey wrench into what constitutes probable cause for police officers who want to enforce the law, especially if they fail to stop and attempt to identify gringos wearing the Yellow Star of David with that message.

Additionally, we call on everybody in Arizona to state the following if questioned by law enforcement about their immigration status: “Disobedience to an unconstitutional law is not punishable before or after the law is declared unconstitutional. I therefore respectfully decline to comply with your request as it violates my constitutional right to privacy and my right to be free from unlawful search and seizure.”

2. We demand that Arizona enact a law to make the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations self-executing so that anybody who is detained for two hours or longer for suspicion of being unlawfully in the United States be advised of their right to contact the consular officials of their nation and that their consular officials be notified by law enforcement of their detention and given access to the prisoner.

3. We call upon Mexico to invoke the provisions of Article XXI of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to demand formation of a bilateral commission to formulate proposed solutions to ALL ISSUES INVOLVING IMMIGRATION INCLUDING THE QUESTION OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE BORDER ITSELF BECAUSE OF CONSISTENT U.S. (E.E.U.U.) VIOLATION OF THE TREATY AND THE PROTOCOLS OF QUERETARO. If such a commission cannot resolve these issues, we expect Mexico to invoke Article XXI rights to third-nation neutral arbitration of the disputes.