CASES IN PROGRESS
IS ROCKY DELGADILLO PROSECUTING
SAM SAHAB AND PRESTIGE PARKING BECAUSE HE'S IRANIAN-
AMERICAN OR JUST BECAUSE HE DOESN'T CONTRIBUTE TO
ROCKY'S CAMPAIGNS FOR PUBLIC OFFICE?

DOWNLOAD THE FOLLOWING PDF FILE AND THEN
DECIDE WHETHER THAT QUESTION IS A GOOD ONE OR NOT!

CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING TIMELINE:

  • On March 8, 2006, Delgadillo, the City Attorneys Office
    and a private law firm retained by the Community
    Redevelopment Agency file suit against a whole bunch of
    companies and organizations--including Grant Parking
    owned by the Ullman family--in an eminent domain case
  • On March 15, 2006, Richard Ullman contributes $5,600 to
    "Californians for Rocky" -- Delgadillo's campaign
    committee for his 2006 Primary run for Attorney General
  • On March 16, 2006, two things happen:  the lawsuit is
    dismissed only against Grant Parking and Cathryn Ullman
    makes an additional $5,600 contribution to Californians
    for Rocky

Jan Tucker's Declaration & Court Documents from Case No. 6
CA 02508
In connection with the City of Los Angeles' prosecution of Sam Sahab and Prestige
Parking, J.B. Tucker & Associates sent two (2) letters to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio
Villaraigosa, neither of which he has bothered to respond to (including but not
limited to violating the California Public Records Act time deadline).  The second
letter, dated May 11, 2007, asks Mayor Villaraigosa to explain a campaign contribution
he received from a certain very notorious convicted felon (made before the man's
felony conviction).  In my letter, I posed the issues as:

"If you know why xxxxxxxx made this contribution, I would like you to explain it.  If you
don’t but know (or can find out) what persons from your campaign staff might have
information regarding this contribution I would like to interview them regarding it.

I am also asking that (1) you disclose to me whether you ever used xxxx's services
for “opposition research,” (2) if you used him for “reverse research,” (i.e.,
investigating yourself in order to anticipate what a political opponent might find out),
(3) whether Pellicano’s payment was by check or some other instrument that would
enable him to ascertain the bank account number in which it was deposited (in the
event that you were the target of one of his investigations), and (4) you make
yourself available for an interview regarding this matter."

The second letter speaks for itself.  Download it below:

CLICK HERE FOR CA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST TO MAYOR VILLARAIGOSA
CLICK HERE TO READ ATTORNEY ROGER JON DIAMOND'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE
GUILTY VERDICTS IN THE CASE OF PEOPLE V SOHRAB SAHAB & PRESTIGE PARKING
New LULAC Civil Rights Manual Features Tucker in 33 year old murder case investigation
Excerpts from LULAC National Civil Rights Manual
Case No. BC 441643, Los Angeles Superior Court.  
A lawsuit has been filed by Angel Luevano, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) Vice President for the
Far West Region, and Argentina Luevano, California State Director, challenging what they allege to be unfair and
fraudulent election practices both within the national and state LULAC organizations.
Click Here to see the Los Angeles Superior Court Complaint filed in Luevano et al vs Diaz et al
Click here for the First Amended Complaint in Luevano v Diaz