Rules for Radicals
My Commentary: Nicholas Von Hoffman was at the 1972 People’s Party (Peace & Freedom Party’s national affiliate) Convention in St. Louis where I was the youngest delegate (not even old enough to vote). He was there as a journalist. Gayle Justice, one of our delegation leaders from California asked him, only half jokingly, whether he wanted us to put his name in nomination for President. He laughed…he needed that like he needed a hole in his head.
Some people are of the opinion that I’ve grown up to be a fairly successful radical organizer and I owe much of my success (if it can be called that) to Saul Alinsky organizing principles. Alinsky’s Reveille for Radicals was required reading for Field Work in Barrio Studies at Cal State University at Northridge (CSUN) Chicano Studies Department and that was a required course for the B.A. in Chicano Studies (I was the second gringo in America to get one). In addition to the in-class coursework, I did my field work with El Partido de La Raza Unida in San Fernando.
Note the rule that Alinsky sets out about distinguishing yourself as a “radical” from a “liberal.” The founder of the union I represented for years in the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor (where I also became First Vice President for Local 69 under two administrations), Heywoud Campbell Broun put my views very succinctly when he said, “A liberal is one who leaves the room when the fight begins.”
Von Hoffman’s third rule, about how the left should stop whining about the press, is very well taken. From my perspective, don’t whine about the press not covering what you’re doing or a viewpoint you’re expressing if you haven’t done anything that’s newsworthy. Why should you expect the press to print your press release when all it has is your opinion or the position paper of the organization written by a committee of people who aren’t newsworthy in and of themselves? There is a way to get that into the paper if you’re too lazy and ineffective to get together an action, like a strike or a demonstration, that might be newsworthy. The way is called buying an advertisement: whether you agree with the capitalist economics of the news industry or not, newspapers, radio stations, and television are businesses and they can’t pay a reporter to print your propaganda if nobody buys advertising from them.
One of Alinsky’s greatest sayings was that “Power goes to two poles: to those who’ve got the money and to those who’ve got the people.” If you don’t have money you can’t buy ad space and if you don’t have people, you’re not likely to be able to generate legitimate news event coverage, unless of course you want to immolate yourself in which case none of this will matter to you after one last event.
Another point Hoffman makes is that being blasted by the enemy in the press is efficacious, which is why I don’t care how anti-my point of view a media pundit is….I’m perfectly willing to walk into the lion’s den. For example, twice before Lou Dobbs was booted off the air by CNN, I wound up on his program discussing my views on immigration representing LULAC. Most spokespeople for pro-immigrant organizations wouldn’t touch the Lou Dobbs show with a ten foot pole. But both times I was on the show, I was able to speak truth to power. It may have been the only times on national media that anybody ever had the chutzpah to call for Article XXI processes under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, i.e., establishment of a joint commission and or neutral arbitration of all issues between the United States of America and the United States of Mexico.
7 Lessons Saul Alinsky Would Give Progressives Today
Tuesday, 06 July 2010 15:45
by Nicholas von Hoffman
The author worked closely with community organizing legend Saul Alinsky.
What would Alinsky say to progressives today?
Floating around in the Internet cosmos is a Web site with a headline asking, “Is Miley Cyrus an Alinskyite Mole Sent to Brainwash Country Music Fans?” It is not known if Ms. Cyrus has the faintest idea who Saul Alinsky was — he died in 1972 — but people in politics now know the name well.
Alinsky, a genius at political tactics, invented community organizing. He is said to have been a major factor in forming Barack Obama’s ideas and to have provided the Obama campaign with the organizational template used in the 2008 presidential campaign. Some place Alinsky’s book on organizing the powerless, Rules for Radicals, on the same level as military classics like Sun Tzu’s The Art of War.
The far right is both hypnotized and terrified of the non-socialist Alinsky whom it brackets with Karl Marx in some of its more hysterical offerings. A better pairing would be with Tom Paine as both were in-the-trenches small “d” democrats. Today literally hundreds of grassroots organizations here and in other countries trace their origins to Alinsky, his ideas and his organizing.
So, if Saul Alinsky were around now, what seven pieces of advice might he offer today’s progressives?
1. For starters, he’d say don’t think you’re kidding anybody by calling yourselves progressives. Your opponents take you to be liberals and hiding behind another name only makes you look timid and timid don’t butter no parsnips.
Alinsky called himself a radical to differentiate himself from liberals who were wishy-washy wusses in his book. As far as he was concerned, liberals were the people who left when the fighting got serious.
2. Enough complaining, criticizing and attacking Obama, Alinsky would say - not out of besotted loyalty to the president but out of hard-nosed political analysis. He would ask, do you have another person who would be better for the job who has any remote possibility of being elected two years from now? Unless you’re nuts, the answer has to be no. Then why, Alinsky would ask, are you moaning, groaning and attacking him? All you’re doing is encouraging people who might vote for him to have second thoughts. Just because you play an important part in electing a politician, it doesn’t mean you own him. It doesn’t mean he will be grateful. Saul would tell you there is no such thing as crying in baseball or gratitude in politics.
When you help elect someone to office, you get a person who is prone to do what you want instead of someone who would die in order to carry out a progressive agenda. But leaning in your favor is not the same thing as delivering the goods.
To get the office-holder to deliver the goods, Alinsky would say, you have to be able to give him or her something he or she wants or needs — or get rid of something he or she fears.
Saul used to tell a story about Robert F. Wagner, Jr., a Democratic mayor of New York City 50 years ago. The mayor was liberally inclined but too much of a politician to take chances. When progressive delegations came looking for his support on one thing or another, Wagner would lean back in his chair with a jovial look on his face, tell them he agreed with them, and that if they wanted it done, they should “march out of here and go make me do it.”
The same with Obama. If you want him to get us out of Afghanistan you have to make him do it, which means make it politically possible for him.
Lincoln did not issue the Emancipation Proclamation until he had the right political cover. If hightailing it out of the Hindu Kush is going to cost the president re-election and the defeat of his party, he is going to continue to try to finesse it and the U.S. Army will stay put. Run two or three antiwar candidates in red-leaning districts and win with them and you will have paved the way out of those mountains.
Simple, but part of Alinsky’s genius was knowing how to keep it simple when all around him were tangled up in complications.
3. Stop grousing about the media. Aimless complaining about the media, mainstream, upstream or downstream, is a waste of effort and re-enforces the idea that progressives are whiners. Alinsky would point out that if you are doing something worthwhile you can assume much of the media is against you. They will come around eventually when you are proven right but until then accept negative coverage and exploit it.
Alinsky was a past master at capitalizing on bad publicity. He would point out that often bad publicity is more useful than the good kind. For example, if you have a major project underway to place power in the hands of the hapless middle class and you get an endorsement from the Wall Street Journal, don’t celebrate; having the Journal back you will only breed suspicion among your own people who know very well the Journal is not on their side so how come it’s on yours?
It’s having the Journal blast you that validates you with the people you are hoping to organize and empower. The worse the blasting the better. Fox News ought to be a godsend for people with practical, political agility.
Properly used, a denunciation from Fox depicting you as a menace to God and country spreads the idea that you are dangerous because you are powerful. People and organizations considered to be dangerous and powerful can spread fear in the hearts of their opponents. Fear makes people do dumb things which you can leap on and use to your advantage. Used correctly, Fox is the answer to a liberal’s prayer.
4. Do not look down on your opponents. Alinsky would tell you that it leads to underestimating them. Liberal Democrats have a record of dismissing key Republicans as stupid. Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush were each in their turn scored off as dumb. All three were two-term presidents, which means they were very lucky or a lot smarter than Democrats gave them credit for.
5. Another piece of advice Alinsky might give is a warning against calling people names. He was not worried about hurting their feelings. Having grown up in Chicago in the wild old days, Alinsky was a rough customer when he needed to be and would not have done well in a sensitivity class.
In fact, Alinsky was very good and often quite imaginative when the occasion for name-calling arose, but when he used names he would be referring to particular individuals, not groups of people.
Calling the Germans Nazis during World War II was OK but in American politics terms such as racist, sexist, antisemitic, trailer trash, etc. are an invitation to alienate those with whom you might find common cause.
Name-calling should be aimed at individuals or small groups such as boards of directors. The names must be calculated to make the other side look ridiculous or convince a wider public than he or she is a bum. Good name-calling, Alinsky would tell you, is like sharp shooting. Don’t do it until you have the target firmly in the cross hairs.
6. Before you do something, Alinsky would say, ask yourself: if you do it and it succeeds as you hope it will, what have you got? If the answer is ego satisfaction, Alinsky would say it’s a waste of time.
Were he around today, he would shake his head at the avalanche of petitions in constant circulation for one progressive cause or another. They are almost always gathered on the Internet and have no effect on the people or organizations they’re aimed at. Who can say how much effort and money goes into them, but whether much or little, it’s wasted.
If you’re going to petition, Alinsky would tell you, do it with imagination. The AIDS quilt with its 40,000 panels contributed by people from every place and every station is a textbook example of taking a worn-out, useless political tactic and turning it into a smashing success.
The same holds true about marching on Washington. Some marches have been hugely effective, none more so than the 1963 event that culminated with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream speech. Most, however, regardless of how large the throng, are poop-outs. The most recent big poop-out was the march for undocumented immigrants’ rights. Alinsky would have told the organizers not to try it because such demonstrations only work when the ground is properly prepared.
7. Alinsky would be highly unimpressed by causes run out of Washington offices staffed by petit bureaucracies who make occasional trips to “the field” by way of an email blast to their listserve. He would warn against organizing and organizations that lean on electronic communications, reminding you that the Internet did not elect Barack Obama. It helped, sure, but the job was done by people at the bottom, doing face-to-face organizing. That, Alinsky would remind you, is where democracy and people power begins.
Nicholas von Hoffman, author of 13 books, recently republished ‘Radical,’ a biography of Saul Alinsky. First published http://www.alternet.org/news/147401/7_lessons_saul_alinsky_would_give_progressives_today?page=entire
Written by : Alias Author
______________________________
My thanks to Darby Mangen of SGV/Whittier NOW for forwarding the article to me.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
