Bring Hollywood Home Fundraiser October 7th


Flier Promoting October 7th concert & dinner to Bring Hollywood Home_001Flier Promoting October 7th concert & dinner to Bring Hollywood Home_002 Page 3_001Sponsorship Letter Bring Hollywood Home Celebrity Dinner & Concert Friday, October 7th, 2016 New Roads Santa Monica_001Sponsorship Letter Bring Hollywood Home Celebrity Dinner & Concert Friday, October 7th, 2016 New Roads Santa Monica_002Sponsorship Letter Bring Hollywood Home Celebrity Dinner & Concert Friday, October 7th, 2016 New Roads Santa Monica_003

Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Many Menus of Socialism


The many menus for socialism

220px-Debs_campaign“Voting for Socialism is not Socialism any more than a menu is a meal. Socialism must be organized, drilled, equipped, and the place to begin is in the industries where the workers are employed…Without such economic organization and the economic power with which it is clothed, and without the industrial co-operative training, discipline and efficiency which are its corollaries, the fruit of any political victories the workers may achieve will turn to ashes on their lips.”–Eugene V. Debs

Doesn't this sound strikingly similar to Bernie Sanders' message?

Doesn’t this sound strikingly similar to Bernie Sanders’ message?

On the left we refer to the many different self-professed “socialist” or “communist” political parties as the “Alphabet Soup Groups.” This is because they all abbreviate their names into initials, like SP, SLP, SDUSA, SWP, CP(ML), CPUSA, RCP, PLP, and so on and so forth. They all have differing catechisms of belief systems that are very much like the catechisms of religions: if you disbelieve what you are told to believe you can and will be excommunicated. Most leftists who are excommunicated will cast about until they find a new organization to accept them until such time as you run afoul of the new catechism you adopted to get in, at which time you are once again excommunicated.

Crit Self Crit_001Those who think for themselves just don’t fit in well with the Alphabet Soup Groups. To mock this state of affairs amongst Maoist organizations, one malcontent set up a Catholic confessional booth at an anti-war coalition’s fundraiser: one booth was labeled “Criticism” and the other “Self-Criticism” because at that time it was the chic thing to do in Maoist organizations of going through rituals of “criticism” and “self-criticism.” It was very similar to the Synanon cult’s practice of “The Games” which was even brought into the administrative practice of the United Farm Workers by Cesar Chavez (other practices of Synanon also came into de facto effect in the California Association of Licensed Investigators [CALI] promulgated when ex-Synanon private investigator Chris Reynolds became president; when he tried to pull those tactics on me, I knew it was time to go and resigned from the Board and all committee assignments).

In light of the campaign of Bernie Sanders, many of the Alphabet Soup Groups (ASG) have written critiques and circulated them about why Bernie is or is not a “socialist” because he does or does not agree with their particular menu of what socialists are supposed to propose programmatically. The fact is that most of these critiques are by people who, if they actually majored in Political Science at a college level, probably missed the requisite course in Methodology (or took it and didn’t understand it) and therefore place the ideology of socialism (as they believe it to be because their ASG says so) before the science. This leads to surreal internal discussions amongst leftists where even the terminology can be the opposite of the way political scientists define concepts.

Two examples:

  1. ASGs universally refer to political parties as “Cadre” and “Mass” parties in exactly the opposite meanings of how political scientists who study and write about political party theory and sociology use those terms;

  2. ASGs almost universally define “fascism” according to a definition which describes the demographic characteristics of the fascist political parties of the 1930s-40s without recognizing that “ism” refers to an ideology. In the ASG definition it is always an obligatory article of faith that to be fascist something has to be a movement involving the middle class. This led former Trotskyist turned Green Party History (not political science) major Peter Camejo to make the absurd claim that William Simon – largest financier of the overtly fascist Catholic Opus Dei order in the United States – was not a fascist because Opus Dei was not a mass movement (seriously…Peter and I engaged in a series of “open letter” polemics over his defense of William Simon; see The ASGs almost universally reject and ignore the nature of fascism as an ideology as being the right wing version of Communitarianism as opposed to Catholic Liberation Theology as left-wing Communitarianism; if they admitted the distinction they might have to admit that the way Fidel Castro organized Cuba was based on Communitaian rather than Marxist principles and that Allende’s program for Chile was decidedly Communitarian rather than Marxist.

At this point let me state that there are some brilliant political scientists who have intellectually honest views of the history of socialist and Marxist ideological development. I recommend in particular Roy Medvedev of Russia and Wolfgang Leonhard of Yale University. Additionally I would point out that “socialism,” that is “social ism” as an ideology did not start with Karl Marx and to put that into context, people should peruse the writings of [see my blog,] Claude Henri de Rouvroy, Comte de Saint-Simon, Francois Marie Charles Fourier and especially Flore-Celestine -Therèse-Henriette Tristan-Moscoso (Flora Tristan). Nor will “socialism” end with so-called Marxists as the only bearers of the true faith. The existentialists, myself included as a phenomenologist (as a methodological school of thought in Political Science) have had as much to offer socialist thought in the 20th and 21st centuries as anybody else.


This has all been introductory for how I think Bernie Sander’s “socialism” should be seen contextually and judged in the modern world; forget the cluttered and muddled pronoucements of the ASGers.

The first Meidner Plan was designed to produce social democracy--the second democracy--within Swedish macro-economic policy

The first Meidner Plan was designed to produce social democracy–the second democracy–within Swedish macro-economic policy

The best context to understand what Bernie has been talking about is that he is programmatically advancing the first two democracies of the 2nd Meidner Plan of the Swedish Socialist Party’s theory of the three democracies. Whether or not Bernie sees it that way I don’t know, but like me he realizes that it’s pointless to advance the third democracy—economic democracy—until we’ve achieved the first two: political democracy and social democracy.

Reducing the power of the Swedish monarchy to a ceremonial role was a critical element of the "first democracy"

Reducing the power of the Swedish monarchy to a ceremonial role was a critical element of the “first democracy”

The first democracy in Sweden entailed the curtailment of the powers of the monarchy, the establishment of universal suffrage, the consolidation of the original five-house parliament system into the workable unicameral parliament (each of the original houses in essence became one of the traditional political parties, as the old sysem represented in Lutheran Sweden a Communitarian governance model straight out of the Catholic doctrines of St. Thomas Aquinas) and similar examples of what we call “small d democracy.” In the United States this fight is similar to Sanders’ calls for abolishing the Citizens United ruling, making voting easier for everybody, and generally curbing the power of the rich to dominate elections.

The second democracy achieved by Sweden is social democracy: the rights of women, minorities and LGBTI people; universal health care; a limitation on rents; the rights of workers to organize trade unions and the other institutions we equate with the so-called “welfare state.” Again, these are the kinds of reforms that Bernie is pushing when he calls for single payer health care, “immigration reform,” an end to police violence and corruption and tuition free higher education.

Economic DemocracyWhat of the third democracy, “economic democracy?” Professor Kjell Östberg of history at Södertörn University in Sweden wrote on September 10, 2015 [] on this topic:

The trade unions wanted to. In 1976 the LO called for the establishment of wage-earner funds. Under the proposal, every year a proportion of a company’s profits — in the form of shares — would be transferred to union-controlled funds. After anywhere from twenty to seventy-five years, workers would control a majority of shares in most companies.

The plan’s call for gradual socialization roiled the party. Palme and the party leadership favored what they used to call “functional socialism”: the deepening of democracy, a growing public sector, greater state planning resources, laws to reduce the influence of employers. Ownership itself they refused to touch.

The “Meidner Plan” was an attack on this credo, and Palme spent several years killing the proposal’s radical elements. His reaction demonstrated that, for all his reform accomplishments, he was not prepared to step beyond the boundaries of capitalism.

While Bernie has not gone there yet, other relatively mainstream politicians have. Former Congressional Representative and Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, repeatedly introduced the National Health Service Act in Congress. I wrote of the proposed NHSA in contrast to “single payer” health care at Because Dellums was actually doing something to create economic democracy rather than just sit around writing menus of socialism, he was the target of the Peace & Freedom Party’s “Berkeley Bullsheviks” who opposed his attempt to be cross-nominated by the PFP along with his Democratic Party nomination one year.

Because Bernie did not actually propose the third democracy the ASG and related groups like the Berkeley Bullsheviks denounce him as not being a “socialist.” This is because they lack Karl Marx’s understanding of the dialectical progression of history; because they fail to appreciate Marx’s notions about the difference between the sub-structure of society, the superstructure of society and that they are just a pimple on the super-structure; because they have no concept of “The Political Consequences of Modernization” [1972 by John H. Kautsky, the son of the Karl Kautsky denounced by V.I. Lenin as “the renegade Kautsky”]; and because few of them have actually gained a well-grounded education in political science or any social science for that matter.

So, unlike Bernie and the movement he’s unleashed, who have advanced the first two democracies far beyond what anybody imagined was possible just a year ago, these ASG pundits prate on about how he’s not a real socialist because he hasn’t put the third democracy on the menu yet. For those of us who already took Eugene V. Debs at his word that “”Voting for Socialism is not Socialism any more than a menu is a meal” I am willing to settle for Bernie’s having organized a movement that is moving towards socialism faster than anything I ever anticipated in the last 50 years.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Strategic Voting Options for those who felt the Bern


Strategic Voting Options for those who felt the Bern

Bernie Sanders 2I felt the Bern a lot longer than others who’d never heard of Bernie Sanders before 2016. In 1972 and 1975 Bernie and I were delegates to the conventions of the People’s Party that nominated anti-war hero Dr. Benjamin Spock for President (1972) and Black Panther Party Education Minister Margaret Wright for President (1976). See where I wrote extensively about that history.

Hillary Clinton HondurasThe concept of a Trump presidency scares the living daylights out of me….even more than a Hillary presidency….and if I actually thought my vote would make a difference in California I’d have to think about voting for her. Her direct role in legitimizing as Secretary of State the military overthrow of the elected President of Honduras alone disqualifies her for me. I did double major in Political Science and Chicano Studies for my B.A. and completed 22 units of graduate work (with a 4.0 GPA) with a concentration on International Relations and Latin America…so I do sort of know something about the subject. Wikipedia succinctly explains that:

In June 2009 a coup d’état ousted President Manuel Zelaya; he was taken in a military aircraft to neighboring Costa Rica. The General Assembly of the United Nations voted to denounce the coup and called for the restoration of Zelaya. Several Latin American nations including Mexico temporarily severed diplomatic relations with Honduras. In July 2010, full diplomatic relations were once again re-established with Mexico.[44] The United States sent out mixed messages after the coup; Obama called the ouster a coup and expressed support for Zelaya’s return to power. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, advised by John Negroponte, the former Reagan-era to Honduras implicated in the Iran-Contra affair, refrained from expressing support.[45] She has since explained that the US would have had to cut aid if it called Zelaya’s ouster a military coup, although the US has a record of ignoring these events when it chooses.[46] Zelaya had expressed an interest in Hugo Chávez’ Bolivarian Alliance for Peoples of our America (ALBA), and had actually joined in 2008. After the 2009 coup, Honduras withdrew its membership. [Emphasis added]

Uh, yeah, the U.S. would have had to cut aid….to the corrupt and brutal oligarchs who took over the country. Following the golpe (Spanish for a coup d’etat) Honduras’ murder rate soared to become the highest per capita murder rate in the world. For a glimpse of what Human Rights Watch had to say about the coup a year after it occurred:

Human Rights Watch has also received credible reports of 29 cases involving threats or attacks against journalists, human rights defenders, and political activists in 2010. For instance, on April 8, Father Ismael Moreno—a Jesuit priest and human rights advocate—received a text message threatening to kill the family of a female coup opponent who had been raped by police officers. Father Moreno had been helping the woman and her family to leave Honduras. In early June 2010, Eliodoro Cáceres Benitez, a political activist, received three death threats by phone, stating that members of organized crime would kill him and his family. His son went missing on June 13; at the time of this writing, his whereabouts remain unknown. On September 15, police and military members attacked the offices of Radio Uno, a station that has been critical of the coup. They launched tear gas into the radio station’s offices, broke windows in the building, damaged equipment, and seriously injured one person. []

That is the government that then-Secretary Clinton refused to break diplomatic relations with….and that is just plain sick.

In California where I live, the Democrats could dig up the grave (of the bones, I understand he was eaten after the 1968 election) of Pigasus—the 1968 Youth International Party (“the Yippies”) candidate for President, put a suit and lipstick on the pig, nominate him for President, and in California Pigasus could beat Trump. So I don’t have to worry about voting for Hillary; in another state you might not have that luxury.

Using the Federal Public Funding Law as a Guide

Breaking the two party monopoly is a very positive goal. If a third party candidate gets at least 5% of the national vote they get retroactive funding for 2016 and get “minor” party funding for 2020 of up to $20,000,000 plus cost of living allowance (COLA). So if I thought that Jill Stein could get over 5% I’d vote for her even though, as I wrote during the primary []:

Jill Stein

Jill Stein

Why not Jill Stein? In 2012 I discussed her views on immigration and learned she knew nothing about the subject. She didn’t even know about the implications of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and especially Article XXI of that treaty on the whole debate. I offered her an opportunity to discuss it with me so she could actually say something intelligent about the subject other than to repeat what the left wing of the Democratic Congressional Latino Caucus tell people they’re supposed to support on so-called “immigration reform.” She had 4 years to bone up and I haven’t heard from her.

Libertarian_PartyThere are some okay things and some bad stuff about the Libertarian Party and as to the latter most of their economic views really do suck. But, if the Green Party does not look like it’s going to make the 5% threshhold but the Libertarian Party might, that’s a reason to vote for Johnson and Weld. Since they don’t believe in public funding at the worst it will be amusing to see whether they don’t accept the $20 million they’d be entitled to.

Keeping my fingers crossed for Gloria La Riva & Dennis Banks

Reiterating what I wrote for the California primary:

Gloria La Riva

Gloria La Riva

Peace & Freedom Party: Vote for GLORIA LA RIVA of the Party of Socialism & Liberation (PSL) in the PFP primary. I don’t always agree with Gloria but like me, she’s absolutely despised by the PFP leadership. My slate endorsed her in 1998 when I was the party’s biggest vote getter and she kicked Marcia Feinland’s ass in the primary for governor for which the leadership has never forgiven her (nor me for that matter; our slate decimated theirs that year). Gloria is also well respected in the labor movement and is currently First Vice President of my union local, Pacific Media Workers Guild, CWA Local 39521 (AFL-CIO, CLC).

The PFP leadership – though Gloria beat her primary opponents by an overwhelming vote in the primary – will try any skullduggery to keep her from getting the nomination.

PFP President_001(From California Secretary of State)

In the primary they violated the legislative intent of the PFP Section of the Elections Code (I know because I helped write that law) by soliciting candidates to run against Gloria and tried to put Jill Stein on the PFP primary ballot, also in blatant violation of the legislative intent of those statutes. They’re now doing another end run around the law by having a Jill Stein surrogate speak for her and try to get her nominated over La Riva.

Dennis Banks

Dennis Banks

Gloria’s running mate is the well known and respected Dennis Banks, of American Indian Movement (AIM) fame.

So all things being equal, I’m taking my cues from Eugene V. Debs and Helen Keller, and voting for Gloria La Riva, because as they said:

“I’d rather vote for something I want and not get it than vote for something I don’t want, and get it.”—Eugene V. Debs

HelenKeller01We the people are not free. Our democracy is but a name. We vote? What does that mean? It means that we choose between two bodies of real, though not avowed, autocrats. We choose between Tweedledum and Tweedledee. We elect expensive masters to do our work for us and then blame them because they work for themselves and for their class.”–Helen Keller

Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

National Chicano Moratorium 2016


Headline from the original Los Angeles Free Press following the August 28, 1970 Chicano Moratorium against the Vietnam War, compliments Steven M. Finger, Publisher, L.A. Free Press

Headline from the original Los Angeles Free Press following the August 28, 1970 Chicano Moratorium against the Vietnam War, compliments Steven M. Finger, Publisher, L.A. Free Press

August 28, 1970, pioneering Chicano Journalist Ruben Salazar was killed by a Los Angeles Sheriffs Deputy who fired a tear gas projectile into a bar literally blowing Ruben’s head off. On that day and at other Chicano Moratorium events protesting the Vietnam War and racism, several others were killed by the Sheriffs, including members of the National Brown Berets de Aztlan and Sephardic Jew Gustav Montag.

As we have done ever since, the National Chicano Moratorium Committee holds its annual commemoration of these events with a march, rally, entertainment and speakers that explain the history and how what we protested in 1970 is very much active and alive today as racism and war still plagues the world we live in.

If you are an entertainer (singer, instrumentalist, rapper, story teller, dancer, hip hop, visual artist???) can you serve  la causa with your talents on August 28 at Ruben Salazar Park in East Los Angeles? Let me know ASAP (!  If you are concerned with the issues we face today, just come and participate:


Unite Against Law Enforcement Abuse


White Supremacy

Support Self Determination and the

Liberation of Occupied Territories

The NCMC calls for a Moratorium on:

  • Migra Raids
  • Re-Invasion of Middle East
  • Migra Deportations
  • Environmental Exploitation
  • Sheriff Corruption
  • Ethnic Cleansing
  • Police Abuse
  • Economic Exploitation
  • Drone Surveillance
  • Border Militarization

Join the Marcha Y Rally, 9:00am from Atlantic Park, 570 S. Atlantic Blvd., & 6thSt., to Ruben Salazar Park, 3864 Whittier Blvd., and Ditman Ave., for 12:30pm Rally.

ORGANIZED BY: NATIONAL CHICANO MORATORIUM COMMITTEE (NCMC), NATIONAL BROWN BERETS de AZTLAN (NBBdA), CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF LATINOS AND CHICANOS, COMITE PRO DEMOCRACIA EN MEXICO. Endorsed by Sonoma County Central Committee, Peace & Freedom Party [County Chair Irv Sutley participated in the 8/28/70 Moratorium and was chased by the Sheriffs through East Los Angeles for the crime of registering voters for the Ricardo Romo for Governor campaign]

CONTACT : NCMC, (323) 687-0963


Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2.5 Million all-time hits on this blog!


The hits just keep on coming!

Sometime in the last few weeks I passed 2.5 million all time hits, thanks to you, my readers:

Site Statistics

Unique Pages Served: 65828

Total Sessions: 735547

Total Page Hits: 2535638

Also thanks to you we’re well over 15,000 subscribers:


  • Subscriber Count


This is a very humbling experience thanks to you all….

Thanks to Readers_001


Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hollywood Diversity Fight Escalates


The following letter just went out in the U.S. Mail:

June 28, 2016

Graphic_001Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20530-0001

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris Attorney General’s Office California Department of Justice Civil Rights Division P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento CA 94244-2550

Honorable Attorneys General Lynch and Harris:

We are writing you to seek appropriate investigations and actions against disparate impact and disparate treatment against women and protected minority groups caused by:

1. The provisions of California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 17053.95(b)(6)which effectively shuts out women and minorities from accessing a tax credit:

  1. Independent film” means a motion picture with a minimum budget of one million dollars ($1,000,000) that is produced by a company that is not publicly traded and publicly traded companies do not own, directly or indirectly, more than 25 percent of the producing company.

  1. The enforcement of California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 17053.95 by the California Film Commission which has shut out independent productions that qualify for the credit in a way that disparately impacts the employment of women and minorities.

Bob Dylan says in two different songs, "Money Doesn't Talk, It Swears." Notice how much MPAA spends on lobbying....

Bob Dylan says in two different songs, “Money Doesn’t Talk, It Swears.” Notice how much MPAA spends on lobbying….

Additionally, we believe that both as enacted and applied, Section 17053.95 – AB 1839 which was written by entertainment industry lobbyists – was intended to be and effectively promotes a conspiracy in restraint of trade. 95% of the tax credits utilized under this law have in fact gone to the studios that already have a dominant market position and thus reinforce their dominance, stymying and stifling independent film production.

usc-annenberg-logoThe USC Comprehensive Annenberg Study on Diversity to demonstrate the known impact of the lack of diversity in the Entertainment Industry – which we contend stems from that industry’s unlawful market share monopolization — showed that in the 414 studied films and series, only a third of speaking characters were female, and only 28.3 percent were from minority groups — about 10 percent less than the makeup of the U.S. population.

Characters 40 years or older skew heavily male across film and TV: 74.3 percent male to 25.7 percent female; Just 2 percent of speaking characters were LGBT-identified. Among the 11,306 speaking characters studied, only seven were transgendered (and four were from the same series); Behind the camera, the discrepancy is even greater. Directors overall were 87 percent white; Broadcast TV directors (90.4 percent white) were the least diverse; Just 15.2 percent of directors, 28.9 percent of writers and 22.6 percent of series creators were female; In film, the gender gap is greatest: Only 3.4 percent of the directors studied were women, and only two directors out of the 109 were black women: Ava DuVernay (“Selma”) and Amma Asante (“Belle”).

BuncheLikewise, the 2016 Hollywood Diversity Report of the Ralph J. Bunche Center for African American Studies at UCLA demonstrates that the trend over the past several years has been towards significantly less diversity in entertainment industry employment. See Exhibit 1, the report’s Executive Summary.

We believe that these statutes and their enforcement are facially unconstitutional under the California Constitution and are in violation of 42 USC 1983 and other civil rights laws, as well as the anti-trust statutes and public policies of the State of California and the United States of America.

As enacted and enforced, California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 17053.95 also violates the California Constitution, Article I, Sections 1, 7 and 31.

We are requesting appropriate investigations into:

  1. The role of industry lobbyists in the drafting phase of AB 1839, which enacted California Revenue & Taxation Code Section 17053.95;

  2. The disparate impact of Section 17053.95 on production by independent film companies and the concomitant adverse impact on employment by women and protected minority groups in the entertainment industry;

  3. The disparate impact and disparate treatment of independent film companies and the concomitant adverse impact on employment by women and protected minority groups in the entertainment industry;

  4. Whether a California Attorney General’s Opinion is warranted on the unconstitutionality of Section 17053.95;

  5. Whether other enforcement action at the state and/or federal levels is warranted into the practices of the California Film Commission.

We can provide you with guidance toward potential witnesses into the Film Commission’s policies and practices, who fear retaliation and blacklisting but who we believe will cooperate forthrightly and candidly with any investigation.

Respectfully Yours,

Jan B. Tucker

for the Same Page/Misma Pagina Coalition (SFV/NELA Chapter, NOW; Miss Revolutionaries; L.A. Progressive; California League of Latinos And Chicanos; California Leadership Institute; Todos Unidos; Bring Hollywood Home Foundation; United For Education Coalition)

Jerilyn Stapleton, President

For California National Organization for Women

David Rodriguez, State Director

For California League of United Latin American Citizens

Erick Holly, President

For Inglewood South Bay Branch, NAACP

Angel G. Luevano


Argentina Davila Luevano

California Leadership Institute

Sherry Lear, Esq.

For Miss Revolutionaries

Sharon Kyle & Dick Price

For L.A. Progressive

Norma Ramirez

President, for United For Education Coalition

Karen Eyres, Treasurer

For Hollywood Chapter NOW

Patricia Nazario

Independent Film Producer

Linda M. Pruett

Co-President, San Fernando Valley/Northeast LA Chapter of NOW

Cynthia Conover

Co-President, San Fernando Valley/Northeast LA Chapter of NOW

Roz Brown

Former President, SFV/NELA NOW

Nancy Pearlman

Independent Producer, EcoNews

L.A. Community College District Trustee (for ID only)

Bring Hollywood Home Foundation Press Release


Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

One Tuff Brand: new clients, new friends


Jan B. Tucker @ OTB Fashion, El Monte

Jan B. Tucker @ OTB Fashion, El Monte

Met with new clients and now new friends yesterday, OTB Fashion.  Founded in 1991, OTB focuses on fast fashion and aims at the teenage market. There are two subsidiary brands, ONE TOUGH BRAND and ONE TUFF BABE. ONE TOUGH BRAND designs skateboard clothing for young men and ONE TUFF BABE concentrates on JEANS; it`s very popular among teenagers.

You can meet them at 

5M4001 5M8003 6002 BLACK FullSizeRender GREEN IMG_6183 IMG_6184 IMG_6202 IMG_6373 IMG_6676 IMG_6677 IMG_6678 IMG_6689 pink ROYAL BLUE WIINE


Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Support SB 443 To Reform “Forfeiture” laws


June 17, 2016

Senator Holly Mitchell Wallis Annenberg Building 700 State Dr., Suite 113 Los Angeles CA 90037 By Fax: (213) 745-6722 (Principal author of SB 443)

Senator Isadore Hall III San Pedro District Office 222 West 6th Street, Suite 320 San Pedro, CA 90731 By Fax: (310) 514-8578

Assembly Member David Hadley 23211 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 200A Torrance, CA 90505 By Fax: (310) 375-8245 (Co-author of SB 443)

Assembly Member Mike Gipson 879 W.190th Street Suite #920 Gardena, CA 90248 By Fax: (310)324-6485

SB 443 – SUPPORT (with suggested amendments)

Honorable State Legislators:

For those of you who know me personally, you are undoubtedly aware that when it comes to criminal investigations I am a switch hitter: sometimes I do prosecution work and sometimes I do defense. I support SB 443 in principle based upon my background, training, education and experience and I also suggest the following amendments.

RedliningThe practical way that prosecutors deal with cash seized in connection with criminal investigation is inextricably linked with their life experience. All too frequently, their only experience with the Barrio and the Ghetto is driving to a courthouse on a freeway from the suburb they live in. It therefore does not occur to them in the first place that Black and Brown communities have long suffered from economic red-lining and that banks are often few and far between, forcing the average person to be more dependent on cash transactions and check cashing institutions whether or not they are involved in crime.

I grew up in the San Fernando Valley in zip code 91331. Banks gradually abandoned the community; at one time a bank merger raised the spectre that two of the last three banks in the area might move.

If you live near Ventura Blvd some communities will have multiple banks on virtually every block; likewise with Wilshire Blvd on the Westside or Hawthorne Blvd in the South Bay. Deputy District Attorneys or Deputy City Prosecutors who grew up in those hoods, have never lived in an area devoid of banks, and who have no friends living in such communities cannot actually conceive of why somebody would keep $1,500.00 hidden in her clothing drawer for any legal reason. I am not describing a hypothetical: I am describing what the late Valerie Monroe and I had to put up with on the all too typical case of a spouse of an accused drug dealer who tried desperately to get her life savings back when it had been seized by the police.

Jan B. Tucker & Valerie Monroe announcing California Three Strikes Project

Jan B. Tucker & Valerie Monroe announcing California Three Strikes Project

Valerie Monroe was not just an attorney. She had served as Chief Deputy Public Defender of the Juvenile Justice Center before going into private practice. She served as Southern California Legal Redress Chair for the NAACP State Conference under Presidents Norm Bullock and Jose De Sosa’s administrations. Valerie and I co-authored the California Three Strikes Project initiative to roll back that law to serious and violent felonies only in 2000, the first initiative effort to reform the law.

A white DDA, who had the effective power of god, i.e. the power to say no to our request for the spouse of the defendant, actually refused to give the woman back her money because she could not believe that anybody would not keep their money in a bank. She also did not believe our protestations that there were no banks in the community. None. Nada. Whatever our client’s purported transgressions (his real transgression was to run afoul from the Compton Police Department narcotics squad’s control over the cocaine trade; they concentrated on putting their dealers competitors out of business), his wife was a clerk at a Boys Market making union wages and trying to raise her children. The DDA also could not conceive of a Black family where one person is law abiding and another family member is not.

H Rap BrownThese attitudes are not exclusive to white prosecutors. It has traditionally been easier for “oreos” or “coconuts” to get hired into occupations that were previously reserved for white people. Thus, while H. Rap Brown warned in the 60s that “Justice in America means ‘Just Us’ White folk,” there may persist in institutions an attitude of “Just Us who think like White folk” because we grew up in white neighborhoods, went off to previously segregated prep schools and colleges and had better prospects of being the first minorities hired.

Thus, potential amendments to existing forfeiture laws should provide guidance for the due diligence that goes into prosecutorial decision making, e.g.:

  • When a law enforcement agency contends that the amount of cash seized is consistent with proceeds from drug dealing, they must document its consistency with other specific cases subject to disclosure and discovery and cannot simply rely upon a purported “expert opinion” of a narcotics officer;

  • When a law enforcement agency contends that the amount of cash seized would or should have been deposited in a financial institution, it must demonstrate that (a) those who claim to own the money are “bankable,” (i.e. that their credit history would not preclude them from even having an account under normal and customary banking regulations), (b) that there are sufficient banking resources available in the community, and (c) that they have conducted a reasonable inquiry from impartial sources that attest that any particular ethnic group does not have a cultural bias against using American banking institutions (I know and raise this latter issue because I personally worked undercover for 11 months amongst a work force that was overwhelmingly composed of Mexican nationals and other immigrants);

  • Any person offering “expert” opinions on these matters must meet Daubert vs Merrill Dow 509 U.S. 579 113 S. Ct. 2786; 125 L. Ed. 2D 469 (1993) standards [as opposed to simply Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) standards] and must have at least a B.A. and have achieved a passing grade in either statistics or logic or preferably both at a college level.

Thanking your for your prompt attention, I remain,

Respectfully Yours, Jan B. Tucker

Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions, Private Investigation Industry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Judge Aaron Persky: A Bench is Not a Throne


Santa Clara Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky

Santa Clara Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky

The current controversy over Judge Aaron Persky’s sentence of a Stanford University athlete to six months in jail and three years probation after a jury convicted him of three felony counts of sexual assault has sparked over a million online signatures supporting his removal from office.  Stanford University Law Professor Michele Dauber is also organizing a formal recall petition to force Persky to face the voters.

Persky should have been voted out of office a long time ago though because of his role in a civil case, also involving the sexual assault of another unconscious woman. As Wikipedia explained:

In 2011, Persky presided over a civil lawsuit against multiple members of the De Anza college baseball team, who were accused by the underage plaintiff of gang-raping her while she was unconscious until passersby intervened. During the trial, Persky decided that the jury should be allowed to view seven photos of the plaintiff taken at a party she attended approximately a year after the alleged gang rape, as per the defense’s claim that this evidence contradicted the plaintiff’s claims. The plaintiff’s attorney, who argued the photos were irrelevant, described this decision as prejudicial against her client.[14] An ABC News 20/20 episode aired on June 5, 2009 on the case.[15] The jury in this civil case found the defendants to be not liable for the charges against them.[16]

Former Assembly Member Scott Wildman got AB 1926 passed on rape evidence

Former Assembly Member Scott Wildman got AB 1926 passed on rape evidence

I know a few things about evidence used in sexual assault cases.  In a recent case I argued in a declaration that a woman’s attire made a particular accusation that a man groped her in a particular way physically impossible, while both were walking down the street at the time (and she would have tripped if he did what she claimed he’d done because her dress was down to her ankles and she said he reached up under the dress and grabbed her crotch and buttocks).  This was in spite of the fact that my NOW Chapter (SFV/NELA) and I were the key proponents of AB 1926 (Scott Wildman, D-41st AD, 1998 Legislative Session) which banned the use of a woman’s attire by the defense to prove consent.

One thing I also know about is the election and regulation of Judges in California and why a political revolution–Bernie style–is needed to overhaul the system.  First, let’s look at why and how Aaron Persky got in office and how he stayed there (again, from Wikipedia):

Persky worked for the law firm of Morrison & Foerster, practicing corporate civil litigation.[6][9] While in private practice, he received the California Association of Human Relations Organizations’ Civil Rights Leadership Award for work on hate crimes, and the State Bar of California’s Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award for his pro bono work for the poor.[9]

In 1997, Persky joined the Santa Clara District Attorney’s Office.[9] In this position, he prosecuted criminal offenses which included violent sex crimes and hate crimes. He served on the executive committee of the Support Network for Battered Women and the Santa Clara County Network for a Hate-Free Community.[6]

By 2003, Persky was a deputy district attorney in the Santa Clara District Attorney’s Office and prosecuted juvenile offenders; he was also a member of the DA’s Juvenile Wards Team.[6]

Judicial career

In 2002, Persky unsuccessfully ran for a seat on the Superior Court of California in Santa Clara County,[6] losing to Ron Del Pozzo, who was also a deputy DA.[8][10] Persky received 102,801 votes (47.9%), to Del Pozzo’s 111,679 votes (52.1%) for Seat 16 on the court.[10] In his 2002 run, Persky was endorsed by the Santa Clara County Bar Association (and its Women Lawyers Committee)[8] and by the San Jose Mercury News, while Del Pozzo received the endorsement of Sheriff Laurie Smith, U.S. Representatives Zoe Lofgren and Mike Honda, and the AFL-CIO. Both candidates ran a positive race.[10]

Persky received an appointment to the court from California Governor Gray Davis the following year.[6]

He is the former Chair of the Court’s Community Outreach Committee.[11]

In June 2016, Persky was elected without opposition for another six-year term on the bench.[12] The vast majority of Santa Clara County judges—25 in total— ran unopposed in 2016.[8][13] He was 54 years old at the time.[6]  [Emphasis added]

My old friend, retired Deputy Public Defender Aram James, got into a public debate with Persky when Persky ran for Judge, with Persky taking a position against judicial candidate transparency:

Most California Judges, not just Santa Clara county judges, run unopposed.  “Most” is actually a low figure.  Challenges to sitting judges no matter how horrible they are, are almost non-existent.  Why?


Judge Charles W. Stoll threw out a Family Leave Act case against Disney Imagineering brought by a member of my NOW Chapter. We pulled his Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests and found that his single largest investment was in Disney stock….like around $50,000.00 worth of it.  Responding to my press release announcing my complaint to the Commission on Judicial Performance, Stoll told reporters that he didn’t know that state law required him to recuse himself — on the 23 out of 25 cases in the Glendale Branch that had conveniently been assigned to him, not one of which made it to trial — for any conflict of more than $1,500.  My response to his claim was that when a judge claims “ignorance of the law” as an excuse, it “is not an excuse; it’s an indictment.”  See

The result:  Stoll was publicly reproved by the Commission, and later when I was sued in a case before him, he extended the deadline to allow the Plaintiff to serve me without any legitimate cause.  I complained to the Commission that he should have recused himself because I had very publicly gotten him disciplined.  The Commission refused to take any action.

Run against a judge and the retaliation will be even worse by the judge’s colleagues and the Commission will do nothing to protect you.

Filing Fees and Ballot Statement Fees

California filing fees to run for office are a percentage of a year’s salary for the office, so every time they raise their salaries they make it that much harder for working people and the poor to run for office.  The current filing fee is $1,890.41 to run for judge and the way the rules are rigged, in order to hope that you can file for one of the several seats that might be vacant, you might have to pay filing fees for more than one seat just to play the game and get into the right race.

Candidate statements will cost Superior Court candidates tens of thousands (I think around $50,000) and you cannot even get those fees waived if you are indigent (from the LA County Candidate Handbook):

INDIGENT CANDIDATES – If a candidate alleges to be indigent and is unable to pay the advance fee for submitting a candidate statement, the candidate shall submit an Affidavit of Financial Worth to the local agency to be used in determining the candidate’s indigence eligibility. The affidavit shall be submitted by the candidate with their candidate statement by the specified deadline. The candidate shall certify under penalty of perjury the truth and correctness of the content of the affidavit. A determination shall be made whether or not the
candidate is indigent and the local agency will notify the candidate of its findings. If a determination is made that the candidate is indigent, the local agency shall print and mail
the statement without payment of the advance fee. The candidate will be billed the actual pro rata share of the cost following the election. If a determination is made that the
candidate is not indigent, the candidate shall withdraw the statement or pay the requisite fee within three days of notification, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and State holidays.

In Knoll v. Davidson (1974) 12 Cal. 3d 335 [116 Cal. Rptr. 97, 525 P.2d 1273] the California Supreme Court, writing in the wake of Lubin v. Panish (1974) 415 U.S. 709 [39 L.Ed.2d 702, 94 S.Ct. 1315], held that even indigent candidates could be forced to pay to have a statement included in the ballot pamphlet.  Lubin, (I assisted with the legal research on the case with Attorney Marge Buckley) threw out California’s old filing fee law as facially unconstitutional for discriminating against people of modest means.

After years of other litigation and legislation, where we are now is that we wind up with 34 candidates for U.S. Senate on the ballot because they could afford or raise the filing fee of $3,480.00, even though the only justification the U.S. Supreme Court has ever held was a legitimate reason for a filing fee was to limit the size of the ballot to something reasonable.  Some of those candidates were frivolous; some were arguably insane; in fact, some argue that the Republican candidate for President, Donald Trump, is nuts but he can pay any filing fee to get on the ballot with ease, while perfectly legitimate working class and indigent candidates are effectively kept off the ballot, because Proposition 14 and subsequent legislation abolished the previously reasonable requirements for signature in lieu of filing fees that applied to third party candidates.

Likewise, wealthy candidates for Judge and their wealthy supporters can get subsidized by having their statements in the ballot pamphlet.  Sole practitioners and their working class clients can’t raise that kind of initial expense.

A Platform for Reform

  1.  Abolish filing fees to run for Superior Court (and for that matter, for all public offices).  There should be one rule for rich and poor alike to get on the ballot. You should simply not be able to buy your way on the ballot.
  2. Abolish all fees to have a candidate statement included in any ballot pamphlet for all offices.  These statements are a service to the voters who can then intelligently select from what a candidate puts in writing to all voters on an equal opportunity basis.
  3. Require a Judge’s most recent Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests (redacted as to address information or simply listing their courthouse address) be posted at their courtroom door and/or in the court clerk’s office for public inspection, to avoid a Charlie Stoll having the audacity to throw every case against Disney out of court in its home district while owning thousands in Disney stock.
  4. Specify specific penalties for specific judicial misconduct by law, so the Charlie Stolls of the world cannot get off with a slap on the wrist for decisions that ruin people’s lives and then get re-elected without opposition or significant consequence.

An important alternative and informed viewpoint

Aram Byer James

Aram Byer James

My old and dear friend Aram James was a Santa Clara County Public Defender for just about forever.  If there’s anybody who knows the County court system like the back of their hand, it’s Aram, and this is what Aram has to say about Persky and the cases he’s handled:

Getting back to Judge Persky, like most California Judge’s the guy’s financially well heeled.  There are very few Judges that you could characterize as being working class or of even representing the interests of the working class on the bench.  So take a look at Judge Persky’s Statement of Economic Interests:

R_Persky_Michael_A_001 R_Persky_Michael_A_005 R_Persky_Michael_A_002 R_Persky_Michael_A_003 R_Persky_Michael_A_004




Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I Like Bill but I Back Bernie: Feeling the Bern since 1972


Bill Clinton & Jan B. Tucker @ The L.A. Biltmore Hotel

Bill Clinton & Jan B. Tucker @ The L.A. Biltmore Hotel

One of my signature photos is with Bill Clinton and having met him and heard him speak you’ve got to admire his brilliance, his oratorical ability and his ability to persuade.  That doesn’t mean I agree with his politics nor for that matter Hillary’s politics.  Entirely aside from my political disagreements with the Clintons I’ve been feeling the Bern since 1972 when Bernie and I were delegates to the People’s Party national convention that nominated Dr. Benjamin Spock for President and D.C. School Board member Julius Hobson for Vice President.  More about my role at that convention is found at:

The history of that convention is now coming full circle because it will be interesting to find out whether Bernie Sanders supported the minority “socialist” economics plank I wrote or the majority “populist” plank.  I sent this letter to the University of Missouri archives earlier this year and still haven’t gotten a reply to try and document if Bernie had a role in this….I think he was on my side but I just don’t remember precisely:

February 27, 2016 Gary R. Kremer, Director Western Historical Manuscript Collection 2 Ellis Library Columbia MO 65201-7298

Dear Mr. Kremer:

Wikipedia indicates that the archives of the People’s Party which held it’s 1972 and 1975 conventions in St. Louis are located at the WHMC of UM.

Along with now-Senator Bernie Sanders, I was a delegate to both of those conventions. Sanders’ role in those conventions will now obviously be a matter of great historical and news interest.

If the collection for the People’s Party is indexed anywhere online, or if any of the actual contents are in digital form on the internet, I would appreciate it if I could get the URL to access those records. Ultimately what I would like to get access to, preferably in digital form are:

  1. The party platforms of the 1972 and 1976 campaigns; most specifically I would like the 1972 Ageism plank (which I wrote) and the Majority and Minority economic planks (I wrote the Minority “socialist” economic plank); and the Gay rights planks.

  2. The documents signed by delegates to get the Ageism and Minority Economic planks on the convention floor for a vote;*

  3. The delegate and observer lists for each convention;

  4. Any other documents with references to (a) Bernie Sanders, (b) other Vermont Liberty Union Party delegates, (c) Jan Tucker [i.e., myself), (d) California Peace and Freedom Party delegates, (e) Charles “Chuck” Avery of Indiana Peace & Freedom Party [who at some point was People’s Party National Secretary], (f) the appearance at the 1972 convention of Dick Gregory and his endorsement of the Spock Hobson ticket.

Thanking you for your prompt attention, I remain,

Respectfully Yours, Jan B. Tucker


The document for the socialist economic plank should contain the signatures of Fred Stover, President of the U.S. Farmers Union and former Under-Secretary of Agriculture under Henry Wallace; and Carl Braden, President of the Southern Conference Education Fund. I don’t remember if Bernie Sanders signed on to it but whether he did or didn’t will obviously be of great public interest.

Young Bernie supporter Corin Sowers speaks with Marge Buckley about our meet ups with Bernie in 1972 and 1975; while waiting in line for Bernie's San Pedro appearance with Harbor Labor Coalition unions

Young Bernie supporter Corin Sowers speaks with Marge Buckley about our meet ups with Bernie in 1972 and 1975; while waiting in line for Bernie’s San Pedro appearance with Harbor Labor Coalition unions

Two issues that are underscored by Bernie’s participation in the 1972 and 1975 People’s Party conventions are (1) his track record of supporting African American causes and (2) his support of Gay rights.  Much has been made of Bernie’s support for Jesse Jackson’s presidential candidacies but Bernie backing Black candidates at the Presidential level didn’t start with Jackson.  In 1972 (see we nominated Julius Hobson (of Supreme Court “Hobson vs Hansen” fame) and in 1975 we nominated Los Angeles’ own Black Panther Party Minister of Education Margaret Wright for President who ran with Dr. Spock for Vice President in 1976.  In Vermont, to get Margaret on the ballot for the Liberty Union Party primary, we had to file and win in the U.S. Court of Appeals Wright vs Thomas to enforce our earlier victory in California’s U.S. Supreme Court Lubin vs Panish decision, to establish the right of working people and the poor to run for office without paying filing fees.

Bill Clinton & Helen Verniece Morgan

Bill Clinton & Helen Verniece Morgan

As an interesting aside, Helen V. Morgan who’s been on Hillary’s team ever since she had her picture taken with Bill at the Biltmore (with me) recently heard Bernie speak….and now she’s feeling the Bern too….like many in the Black community she just didn’t know Bernie and now that she’s heard him she realizes just how much she agrees with his issues and his track record with the African American community.

On LGBTI rights the contrast between Hillary and Bill Clinton and Bernie could not be more stark.  Hillary and Bill backed the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.  Both these measures were disgraceful:  during a national protest against DOMA called by the National Organization for Women (see for more about that protest and other records of the Peace & Freedom Party and People’s Party on LGBTI rights) I personally performed a Lesbian marriage in front of the Van Nuys Federal Building.

Bernie’s record on LGBTI rights is spot on; watch him denounce a homophobic congressman in 1995:

Bernie’s LGBTI rights stances also go back to our 1972 and 1975 People’s Party record on those issues.  I remember poignantly watching Dr. Spock give a big bear hug to People’s Party (and Gay activist from Indiana Peace & Freedom Party) National Secretary Chuck Avery at the convention.  For people like us it was perfectly normal; but in 1975 even the concept of the world’s greatest and best-read pediatrician hugging a Gay man in public or private was a cause for most folks to freak out.

So, what to do about the California Primary?

If you’re No Party Preference or a Democrat, unequivocally absolutely vote for Bernie…..but some of us need to keep a third party option alive now and for the future, precisely because the forces that brought us DOMA and Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and mandatory minimum sentencing and the like are still going to be alive and well in the Democratic Party and that fight will continue even if Bernie wins the presidency.  So here are some alternatives:

Gloria La Riva

Gloria La Riva

Peace & Freedom Party:  Vote for GLORIA LA RIVA of the Party of Socialism & Liberation (PSL) in the PFP primary.  I don’t always agree with Gloria but like me, she’s absolutely despised by the PFP leadership.  My slate endorsed her in 1998 when I was the party’s biggest vote getter and she kicked Marcia Feinland’s ass in the primary for governor for which the leadership has never forgiven her (nor me for that matter; our slate decimated theirs that year).  Gloria is also well respected in the labor movement and is currently First Vice President of my union local, Pacific Media Workers Guild, CWA Local 39521 (AFL-CIO, CLC).



Green Party:  Vote for SEDINAM MOYOWASIFSA-CURRY longtime African American activist and friend who I met through my Black Panther Party circles.  Why not Jill Stein?  In 2012 I discussed her views on immigration and learned she knew nothing about the subject.  She didn’t even know about the implications of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and especially Article XXI of that treaty on the whole debate.  I offered her an opportunity to discuss it with me so she could actually say something intelligent about the subject other than to repeat what the left wing of the Democratic Congressional Latino Caucus tell people they’re supposed to support on so-called “immigration reform.”  She had 4 years to bone up and I haven’t heard from her.  As another Oh By the Way, another Green aspirant, Darryl Cherney is a special kind of stupid…..


For U.S. Senate see my commentary at:

Los Angeles County District Attorney


Los Angeles County, Judge of Superior Court

Office No. 11 – Debra R. Archuleta

Office No. 42 – E. Matthew Aceves

Office No. 60 – Stepan W. Baghdassarian

Office No. 84 – Susan Jung Townsend

Office No. 120 – Ray Santana

Office No. 158 – Kim L. Nguyen

Office No. 165 – Kathryn Ann Solorzano

LA Supervisorial Seat 2


LA Supervisorial Seat 4


LA Supervisorial Seat 5


Torrance City Council (vote for 3)




Proposition 50


Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments