Take Cover: Hired Mudslinger Rides Into the 2014 Election


OPPOSITION RESEARCH: “Take Cover, Hired Mudslinger Rides Into Town”

The self appointed Commisar/Fuehrer of the California Peace & Freedom Party, Kevin Douglas Akin, fancies himself to be a brilliant researcher and freelance writer. Now and then, he makes me the target of his outstanding skills and comes up with stuff that my other enemies have never accused me of before; e.g., that supposedly I’m not Jewish, was not brought up as a Jew, and my family had no known connection to Judaism. See for my refutation of that bizarre canard amongst other things:  http://janbtucker.com/blog/2012/10/30/konversations-with-kevin-7/

Kevin’s latest attack on me isn’t really worthy of analysis. It’s just too weird:

On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 9:18 AM, Kevin Akin <kevinakin1950@hotmail.com> wrote:

I am very sorry to bother the majority of you, whom I believe had no desire to receive the original e-mail from Jan Tucker that was sent to this list, but I think it necessary to inform you that his charges are entirely baseless.

I have not in fact telephoned anyone at all on the list of those people Jan claims as his endorsers. I did send an e-mail (a polite and friendly one, that led to some hours of friendly discussion by e-mail during the day) to one of the people he listed, whom I know. And another Peace and Freedom Party official sent an e-mail to another of his supposed “endorsers” who was an old friend.

I certainly have not threatened anyone with anything.

Jan, I have learned, totally misrepresented the situation to those from whom he sought endorsements. He claimed that he was the only Peace and Freedom Party registrant running for Board of Equalization in the Third District. And he presented an endorsement of his campaign as a way to show solidarity with the Peace and Freedom Party.

In fact, Jan Tucker is not supported or endorsed by the Peace and Freedom Party at any level. The Los Angeles County Central Committee and the State Officers (acting by prior authorization of the State Central Committee) have endorsed Eric Moren of Ventura as our candidate for Board of Equalization, and are pushing hard for write-in votes for Eric. He is the only candidate with a chance of displacing a particularly nasty race-baiting Republican, G. Rich Marshall, as the second vote-getter in the “top two” primary today.

Since 1998, two years after private detective Jan Tucker got just one vote at the California State Convention for the Peace and Freedom Party nomination for president, he has conducted a fairly incompetent but still vigorous effort to damage or destroy the PFP. I will not bore you with a long list of his outrageous trickery and lies, but I will just mention that after I was elected State Chair for this two-year term in August of 2012, Tucker sent red-baiting letters to the employers of two of my adult children, urging them to fire my children because their father is a notorious socialist activist. (Shocking, I know, but I have retained copies of these communications in case anyone doubts me.) (Jan’s red-baiting did not work, and my kids kept their jobs.)

As you should all recognize, Jan Tucker would not have a chance at a Peace and Freedom Party endorsement for any office at all, even should hell freeze over and pigs fly. His campaign is just another effort at disruption and confusion.

If any of you live in the Third District (Ventura and most of the population of Los Angeles Counties), and have not voted yet, I urge you (and the Peace and Freedom Party urges you) to write in Eric Moren for that office.

Again, I apologize for bothering you once more. The election is today, and I don’t think anyone will find this interesting after the election. With my apologies, Kevin Akin

Here are a couple of the responses of the people who received Akin’s tirade:

Jan… I just noticed this weird response in my inbox. I thought maybe you would want to have a copy of this if this person didn’t send you a copy. He doesn’t say very nice things about you, I thought perhaps you would like to respond to him personally.

Greetings all on this list:

I find it most disturbing how a person like Kevin Akin, the Party sitting State Chair can make demands of other party members to vote his way! Voting is very private matter, and while we can try to influence another person’s voting preference persuasively, we must not cross the line of intimidation.

This seems to be just what the P&FP State Chair Keven Akin has recently done with the former party Presidential Candidate Roseanne Barr! Demanding she withdraws her support for her selected pick for 3rd District Board of Equalization, which happens to be Jan Tucker. Well, I also support Jan Tucker’s Candidacy!

So does Mr. Akin feel he can force others to vote his way? This is just unconscionable for sure and does not serve the party well. No one has the right to force anyone to vote or not to vote!

This is just reminiscent of slavery times, when slaves had no rights, but once able to vote have faced tremendous intimidation to date through all kinds of machinations!

A couple of months ago, I prepared a document, which I have sent out via email and distribute at events, etc. This is how I try to influence others without demands.

There are clear choices on June 3rd 2014 CA Primaries for your consideration


It is critical to vote outside of the 2 electoral political party Dictatorship (Dems/Reps) Black box, instead choose Socialist Candidates at every cost. Because you may or not know that since 2010, two earlier propositions were pushed/passed by Democrats and Republicans to undermine/eliminate all Third (2nd) registered Candidates in California!


Socialist Candidates can be registered with Electoral Partys like the Peace and Freedom, be Independent, or Decline to State. Their challenge is greater to raise necessary funds to compete with the Top 2!!

**Read more here: “In statewide debut, top-two primary blocks third parties from June ballot” and Small Parties Sue to Block Prop. 14 And at: http://peaceandfreedom.org/home/articles/general/966-small-parties-sue-to-block-prop-14

This means that if Socialist Candidates are not elected in this June 3rd Primary cycle with enough vote support, they are then eliminated from the November wide Elections!!! They can only participate in the Primaries!!!


***Here are some Socialist candidates for your strong support, you will see on your Ballot, depending on your CA region:


Ø Cindy Sheehan for CA Governor, http://www.cindy2014.org/

Ø Howard Johnson for U.S. Representative 34th District,


Ø Mohammad Arif for 16th State Senate district, http://www.senate16mohammadarif.com/

Ø Marianne Williamson for CA 33rd Congressional District.


Ø Amos Johnson for CA Lieutenant Governor, mailto:firebourn@msn.com

Ø Emido”Mimi” Soltisik for 62nd Assembly District, http://mimiforstateassembly.wordpress.com/

Ø Nathalie Hrizi for State Insurance Commissioner, http://www.ourcampaigns.com/CandidateDetail.html?CandidateID=189595

Ø Write In – Alanso Warren for 59th Assembly District,

Ø Write In – Jan B. Tucker for 3rd District Board of Equalization.

Ø Notice: Only one candidate qualified for the ballot for the June 3 primary election for 3rd District B. of E. http://janbtucker.com/blog/2014/05/06/how-to-write-in-jan-b-tucker-for-board-of-equalization/

I’m just curious as to why he said “Hopefully your district”? By being a write in candidate for Dist 3, the same as Jan’s makes this even more weirder. The current democratic incumbent is who Eric takes issue with? When he’s also running against Jan? But what hey, what do I know?

Dina was referring to Eric Moren’s response to my request that he put a stop to Kevin Akin’s campaign tactics on his behalf. This is that exchange:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jan Tucker <pfp@janbtucker.com> wrote:

Attn: Eric Moren

It was brought to my attention that Kevin Akin, purporting to act on behalf of your campaign, has been telephoning people who have endorsed me and has used threats of political retaliation in demanding that the revoke their endorsements.

If you have been aware that he intended to do this, then so be it. If not and if you disapprove of such degenerate and despicable behavior, then I demand that you put a stop to these tactics and run your campaign in a clean and transparent manner.


To all you friends of Jan Tucker-

I have nothing against Jan, I’ve never met him or her, and frankly, very suprised to see this email.

I am a Write-In Candidate for THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION- District 3, (Hopefully your District!)

I have a B.A. in Economics, years of experience in Business, Marketing, Sales, Communications and am now pursuing a career as a Business Consultant here in my new town of Ventura, CA.

I am sincerely running in opposition to the On–going Incumbent Mr. Jerome Horton, who, as a Democrat and ‘life-long politician’, has helped to Unravel and Unwind the Good Work being done by ALL Californian Businesses and Workers….that is- taking us Californians to the #5th World Economy, to about the 25th in LESS THAN 10 YEARS!!

Mr. Horton, started his long-running career with the “BOE” at age 18! And has since served several ‘2 terms’ along the many years he has been with this ‘Branch of Government’. We are BLESSED to have our country’s ONLY Board of Equalization- Tax Fees and Licenses, (think Sales License, Gas ‘spills’ Licenses, ‘Waste’ Licenses’), and Mr. Horton DIRECTLY has been Instrumental in making California WORSE w. His policies and ‘oversight’.

He is whom I challenge. HE is the one I take issue with…
Let’s Get him OUT OF THERE!!!

Eric Moren
Peace and Freedom & “Power to the People!”

Okay, that’s the background; now here’s the back story.

Moren writes in pertinent part:

“I have a B.A. in Economics, years of experience in Business, Marketing, Sales, Communications and am now pursuing a career as a Business Consultant here in my new town of Ventura, CA.”

It’s intuitively obvious that anybody with “years of experience” as he claims would have some presence on the internet but the fact is, prior to the Peace & Freedom Party’s putting out biographical information about Moren in this campaign, using Google, Yahoo, or Bing to find anything about him on the web would have proven fruitless. I tried. I failed to find anything about him using the usual methods that ordinary voters would use to find out about somebody they’re considering voting for….or against.

So, being a Private Investigator and having been dubbed by the Los Angeles Times in a 1984 column headlined “Take Cover: Hired Mudslinger Rides Into Town,” about my expertise in “Opposition Research,” I have a few tricks of the trade up my sleeve. I was also particularly intrigued by the fact that when Akin, Marsha Feinland, Cindy Henderson-Gordon and Gary Gordon first started touting Moren’s candidacy that his name was being circulated amongst PFP circles as “Ephren” or “Efren” Moren, not Eric Moren. Only after he was “endorsed” by the State PFP leadership cabal—and I have been led to understand that even at that point they verbally called him “Ephren” or “Efren” rather than his real name—did they finally start calling him Eric.

That raised big a RED FLAG in my suspicious mind. I started a more extensive “Opposition Research” project designed as we say in the industry, to look up Eric’s A-hole with a microscope.

So, I find that in Eric Moren’s background there’s a huge gap in his residential history in a data base normally used by private investigators to track this sort of thing. He’s living in San Francisco in 1994-1995. Then, he disappears off the grid until 2006 when he resurfaces in Woodland Hills in the San Fernando Valley!

Welly, welly, welly my dear droogies! Are there any other Eric Morens out there? Lo and behold, there’s another Eric Moren, aka “Eric Michael,” who also has lived in San Francisco. As an aside, the use of two usual first names, in this case “Eric” and “Michael,” always raises red flags with experienced background investigators.  Yeah, some people do happen to have surnames that are also given names, but frequently when people adopt aliases for some reason they tend to use two first names.  This Eric Moren:

A Twinkyclean.com advertising photo

A Twinkyclean.com advertising photo

1. Has used a social security number that apparently really belongs to a woman by the name of Danelle who lives in Ohio. The social security number was issued between 1992-1994, coincidentally, just before Eric Moren dropped off the map and has only been used twice on credit header records….literally just two times, once by Danelle and once by somebody using the name Eric Moren in San Francisco.
2. Is the registered owner of the internet domain, http://www.twinkyclean.com, which any reasonable person would read and suspect was a website front for underage male prostitution and human trafficking involving New York and San Francisco.

Twinky Clean’s website is associated with http://www.maleverse.com which in turn is registered through Whoisguard, Inc., a highly secretive Panamanian registered service operating out of a Panama City post office box.

Maleverse, Inc. is a suspended California Corporation which traces back to the Eric Moren associated with Twinky Clean at the San Francisco address at which he made his one and only use of the Ohio issued Social Security number also used only once by Danelle.

California Secretary of State Business Search Information

California Secretary of State Business Search Information

Inquiring minds might think that there’s something fishy with all this. For starters, in spite of Kevin Akin’s having in the past called me an incompetent and a “private defective,” were Kevin et al concerned that I might actually be able to dig all this stuff up and put together the connections? Is that the reason that the PFP leaders bandied about his purported first name as “Ephren” rather than as Eric?

Maybe it’s all very simple. Maybe, just maybe, there are two Eric Morens who just have both happened to live in San Francisco (it’s a very, very, rare name to begin with). Maybe Kevin and his cohorts were afraid that his Eric Moren would get confused with the other Eric Moren who appears on the surface to be running an underage male prostitution ring on an interstate basis, potentially in violation of the Federal Mann Act. Maybe that’s why they used an alias to get him endorsed by the PFP executive leadership.

On the other hand, maybe not.

At least two of the current PFP leaders had the sense to distance themselves from this debacle.  Cindy Sheehan listed other PFP write-in candidates but conspicuously NOT Eric Moren on her slate card circulated on the internet.   Perhaps Cindy was pissed at all the obsessive energy being spent by Feinland and Akin to defeat my candidacy which at the very least complicated the campaign for Sheehan and other serious candidates like Amos Johnson and Nathalie Hrizi.   I also hear that C.T. Weber was wise enough to abstain on the endorsement vote for Moren….maybe he suspected something was up since the information his supporters presented was so sketchy.

Following are two photos, juxtaposed of both of the Eric Morens. Are they two different people or are they the same person, one at a younger age and the other at his current age? You be the judge, because I don’t happen to have access to one of those sophisticated facial recognition programs that predicts what somebody looked like at different stages of their life; the kind of software used to catch Nazi war criminals as an example.

Eric Moren and Eric Moren:  Are they two different Eric Morens or the same guy at two different ages?  The photo of the older Eric Moren was taken on May 23, 2014 with an Apple I-phone Sc at approximately 3:51 p.m. PST.  Some people have suggested that the chins of both persons are similar.

Eric Moren and Eric Moren: Are they two different Eric Morens or the same guy at two different ages? The photo of the older Eric Moren was taken on May 23, 2014 with an Apple I-phone Sc at approximately 3:51 p.m. PST. Some people have suggested that the chins of both persons are similar.


Posted in Ideas & Opinions, Private Investigation Industry, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Iraq’s Future is Yugoslavia


Whether as a unified multi-ethnic/multi-religious republic or as a failed former federal multi-national state, Iraq has two potential futures and they are both Yugoslavia.  The sooner that American and European politicians admit this reality, the sooner that sectarian warfare can be solved.

Before anything else (unless you have at least a B.A. in political science with a concentration on International Relations and/or Foreign Policy) read my blog on the Ukraine and the blog links within that posting to get some basic background on the academic knowledge you need to digest the issues:  http://janbtucker.com/blog/2014/03/19/constitutional-history-of-secession-of-the-former-ussr/

Pay special attention in my blog on the history of secession in the U.S. [http://janbtucker.com/blog/2012/11/16/mythology-of-secession/] to the concept of “Romantic Nationalism.”  Consider how that notion continues to plague objective efforts to analyze the collective motives of whole groups of people to achieve their aspirations and desires for self-rule.  On the left side of the political spectrum one must consider how the flip-side, Romantic Internationalism, clouds the ability to engage in Political Realism.  Orthodox Marxists for instance espouse essentially romantic notions about internationalism simply because Karl Marx espoused internationalism as an ideal superior to nationalism, the latter being an instrument of the capitalist class to oppress, repress, and generally f–k-over the masses.  The left, which inherently believes that human nature is positive  hopes that subjective differences between ethnic, national, and religious groups are just superficial and that they can live together in a multi-national state(s) harmoniously.

Now consider [http://anthroanna.com/2012/10/27/political-anthropological-approach-to-nationalism-and-national-identity/]:

YugoslaviaThere are various definitions of the relationship between the nation and nationalism. I would combine Smith (1996) who argues that “The idea of the nation…is fundamentally cultural and social” (1996:325) with Gellner (1997) who states that nationalism is a political ideology of shared cultural traits. In terms of national identity, Calhoun (1997) argues that nations “are constructed as ‘super-individuals’” (1997:125) thus “national identity assumes a special priority over other collective identities in the construction of personal identity” (ibid.). Similarly, Smith (1991) argues that national identity is the most inclusive collective identity that intersects other categories of class, gender, race, religion etc. (1991:143). However, Bringa (1995) may challenge Smith (1991) in her ethnography of Bosnia- Hercegovina where the category of Muslim became a signifier of identity when differentiating from Croat or Serb, hence the use of ethno-religious category highlights that religion does matter when the dominant hegemonic values attempt to assimilate the minority. Meadwell (1993) may argue that ethnonationalism is a form of internal colonialism, an unequal power relation between ethnic groups in one nation. This is akin to a Marxian view on nationalism, which “assumed that nationalism was the ideology used by capitalists” to maintain control (Llobera 1994:96), Marx associated nationalism with the bourgeoisie; hence he held that the common qualities of the working man were universal and should unite against capitalist nationalism (Guibernau 1997:75). However it is generally agreed that nationalism is not an elite phenomenon but based on mass participation through the internalisation of a given identity (Connor 1990). Hence, after the fall of communism, the nation of Yugoslavia could not be maintained as the regional and ethnic differences that led to nationalist splinter groups vying for independence (Hayden 1996).  This highlights the significance of national identity in the construction of the nation, but it also reminds us that the dominant groups attempt to place their ideologies above those of minorities, thus inducing the idea of internal colonialism.

As an undergraduate and graduate in International Relations at CSUN in the 70s, I wrote extensively on the subject of “internal colonialism,” heavily motivated by the learning from my dual major in Chicano Studies.  I compared in my term papers the relationships and comparisons between Northern Ireland, Pakistan and Bangladesh (the former “East Pakistan”), and Portugal in relation to its so-called “Overseas Provinces” (like Angola and Mozambique) on the one hand and the Barrio and Ghetto within the United States of America.  Bottom line is that whenever a majority group dominates politically, the minority groups get screwed economically, culturally, and in many other spheres of human inter-relationships.

Kosovo_Serbia-mapAfter Yugoslavia split up based upon its pre-existing system of federal “republics,” the equivalent of USA “states” vis a vis the federal government, Serbia itself wound up with its ethnic/linguistic Albanian Kosovo province splitting off in yet another bitter civil war.

Yugoslavia, an invention of the European powers which was dictated by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I, was very similar to Iraq, a Treaty of Sèvres creation:  multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic, and multi-religious/sectarian.  Iraq made no sense whatsoever to Middle Eastern peoples, only to the imperialist and neo-colonialist standards of European powers.  In the modern world Iraq and many other former colonial countries makes sense only if you assume the Western political science concept of the “nation state” as a value above all other values.

IRAQ_ethnic_mapForced together by European occupation forces following World War I, the ethnic, linguistic and national groups have never had any credible reason to believe that anything other than an authoritarian regime could or should bring them together and make them stay together.  Nobody ever in power in the artificially created Iraq ever created living conditions for the various peoples of Iraq that made them believe that one group coming to power wouldn’t mean that all other minorities would suffer under their rule.

iraq_languages_mapThe religious differences in Iraq are illustrated above but omit the Yazidi, the indigenous Kurdish religion prior to their conquest by Muslim Arabs.  If you think the hatred between Sunni and Shiite Muslims is bad, the Yazidi are hated by everybody and accused of Devil worship by their detractors.  Now consider the linguistic differences:  Iraq is a real hodgepodge with Arabic, Kurdish (related to Farsi/Iranian), Assyrian, Turkomani (a Turkic tongue), and Mandian/Aramaic.

People need to start thinking about the basic question, is Iraq possible and has it ever been possible?  Rand Paul recently opined that which history and sociology may have dictated to be intuitively obvious, that it may be IMPOSSIBLE to do anything about the situation and Iraq.  Here’s what Rand Paul had to say about the situation:

“And what’s going on now, I don’t blame on President Obama,” Paul said. “Has he really got the solution? Maybe there is no solution. But I do blame the Iraq war on the chaos that is in the Middle East. I also blame those who are for the Iraq war for emboldening Iran. These are the same people now who are petrified of what Iran may become, and I understand some of their worry.”

So, the future of Iraq?  Either another Saddam Hussein or Tito comes to power and reinstates a totally authoritarian regime (somehow) or else the country comes apart, probably as three separate entities each dominated by the major group, the Northern Kurds, the middle Sunni Arabs, and the Southern Arab Shiites.  Either way it’s back to the future, to Tito’s Yugoslavia or the Post-Tito Yugoslavia.

Posted in Ideas & Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome, Welcome Emigrante


I am absolutely sick at heart, a mi corazon, with the reports of the mass migration of children from Central America….and how the United States of America is dealing with it.

Smedley ButlerThe United States (EEUU) is reaping what we sowed through years of repression and intervention against movements of the people of Central and South America and the Carribean for liberty and social justice which have continued all the way through tacit American support for the overthrow of President Zelaya in Honduras; our deportation of our gang problem (MS-13 and 18th Street) to El Salvador which did nothing but exacerbate the problem to what we now legally define as “Transnational” criminal organization proportions; and so many other ripoffs in the name of American neo-colonialist/imperialism.

Smedley Butler, “The Fighting Quaker,” commanding general of the Marine Corps, on Interventionism

— Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC.


War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business,  for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents. [Emphasis added]

FlotsamThe most brilliant book ever written about the universality of the trials and tribulations of undocumented immigrants was “Flotsam” by Eric Maria Remarque.  This is precisely how emigrantes are treated, as flotsam.



Buffie Sainte Marie

Buffie Sainte Marie

Perhaps the most intelligent thing ever said about the subject though was actually sung, by Buffie Sainte Marie:

So welcome, welcome, emigrante
To my country, welcome home
So welcome, welcome, emigrante
To the country that I love

I am proud, I am proud, I am proud of my forefathers
And I say they built this country
And they came from far away to a land they didn’t know
The same way you do my friend

I am proud, I am proud, I am proud of my forefathers
And I sing about their courage
For they spoke a foreign language and they laboured with their hands
And the work they did was lowly and they dirtied up their clothes
And they came from far away to a land they didn’t know
The same way you do my friend

So welcome, welcome, emigrante
To my country, welcome home
So welcome, welcome, emigrante
To the country that love

To hear it:


Posted in Ideas & Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boxing: A Conspiracy in Restraint of Trade?


June 25, 2015:  an update:

Boxing Commission finally nails Haymon!


A series of seeming unconnected and run of the mill occurrences in the boxing industry might very well be related in a complex web of intrigue….if what my sources say are accurate. If you know something about the boxing industry and have an inquiring mind, consider whether any of the following events, in the context of history, have anything to do with each other and draw your own conclusions:

  • January 26, 1998, Shmuel Flatto-Sharon, arrested in Israel on suspicion of insurance fraud
  • 2000—Richard Schaefer abruptly leaves banking, where he’d been Western U.S. Regional manager for Swiss UBS (he’s a Swiss national) and gets into the boxing business
  • 2000—Al Haymon transitions into the boxing industry from the entertainment industry
Shmuel Flatto Sharon

Shmuel Flatto Sharon

Shmuel Flatto-Sharon is a Polish born ex-Communist resistance fighter who wound up making a fortune in France. He eventually had to flee to Israel ahead of French indictment alleging that he’d embezzled $60,000,000 in 1975. To get out of extradition, he spent a lot of money getting himself elected to parliament in Israel. While successful, he also wound up serving three months of probation for illegal campaign activities….buying votes.

Sharon has a brother in Las Vegas….who shall remain nameless except that my sources tell me that under the alias of “Rabinowitz” he was convicted of some kind of fraud in France and somehow still managed to get into the United States. He is VERY PROMINENT in the Las Vegas night club industry.

At this point let me digress and suggest that my readers consider this prior posting:


One of the people mentioned in that blog is in fact aka Rabinowitz. “Mr. L” is also involved and two others mentioned there are peripherally involved in the events I am describing, according to my sources…which of course are always subject to question.

Richard Schaefer

Richard Schaefer

So, according to my sources, when Sharon was arrested in 1998 he was in a panic to get money into the United States where it would be safely looked after by his brother, “Rabinowitz.” At this time of course, Richard Schaefer was still working for UBS (United Bank of Switzerland, where his father used to be Chairman of the Board). It’s not like Swiss bankers aren’t skilled at helping people launder money. In 1994 the Independent (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/ubs-in-drug-money-laundering-case-employee-suspended–police-arrest-colombian-woman–dollars-150m-account-frozen-1369982.html) reported that in light of the arrest of a UBS Bank Vice President for laundering Colombian drug money:

The Swiss Banking Commission, which supervises the country’s banks, is expected to launch its own investigation into UBS’s handling of the account and may look at its internal procedures for detecting money laundering – against the background of an international drive by central banks to raise the standards of vigilance among financial institutions.

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBS_tax_evasion_controversy

So tying this together, one of my sources claims that a certain somebody at UBS who retired from UBS abruptly in 2000 – facts that coincide with Schaefer’s inexplicable departure – was the person that facilitated laundering money for Flatto-Sharon to his brother, “Rabinowitz,” in Las Vegas and that around the same time, Rabinowitz put together Al Haymon and Richard Schaefer….let’s call it, “networking.” Maybe my source is 100% correct, maybe only 50% correct or maybe it’s all a great fantasy in which at least it would make a great movie, kind of like the Swiss Banker money laundering scenes in Wolf of Wall Street.

Clayton/Sherman acts—monopolization of market share

If you have access to the kind of money that Flatto – Sharon has, if the French indictments are based on a solid case, and if that money is made available by his brother for reinvestment by Al Haymon and Richard Schaefer, it would sure enable you to eventually grab an enormous amount of the market share of a lot of different industries that they chose to put it into. So regardless of where they got their working capital from, lets take a look at the effect that the Haymon-Schaefer alliance has had on boxing since they came into it in 2000.

Although they represent technically separate business entities, Al Haymon and Richard Schaefer have effectively monopolized a market share forcing competitors horizontally and vertical level market participants into a take it or leave it business environment where the deal offered is a deal that market participants cannot refuse, in the sense that an LCN Mafia godfather might offer it.

The monopolization of this industry by Haymon et al is open and notorious, as are its effects. Examples of the open traffic in boxing media:

• November 3, 2012: Here’s a memo for Hip Hop dude turned prize fight promoter 50 Cent – Don’t piss off Al Haymon. I wonder if 50 realizes that having a good stable of fighter’s doesn’t mean squat if you can’t secure any TV dates for them. [http://www.examiner.com/article/50-cent-vs-al-haymon-equals-no-tv-dates-for-50]

• [http://www.thesweetscience.com/news/articles-frontpage/17953- fans-choice-for-floyds-next-khan-or-maidana]
The Shadow says:
[QUOTE=Carmine Cas;43539]The UFC/WWE model is what I was alluding towards, the one big promoter in the sport that every fighter seeks to be a part of. I know the promoters’ number one goal is to make money, but their goals are more instant gratification. If they were to unite and form a “league” they command a much larger part of the market share, and in the long run make more money. The brand would be better known to casual fans around the world. With Arum getting old it could happen, and hopefully it will.
The Oscar-Pac split is pretty funny[/QUOTE]
Did some research. The other two were 50-50 until Margarito started acting like a spoiled b*tch so HBO had to give him a little extra money on the side because he felt he was the bigger draw and the champion.
Which I guess in some way was fair enough but he allegedly started with the crap after everyone thought they had a deal. Good for him he got spanked.
As for market share, they already dominate it. GBP and TR already sit atop roughly 80% of the market, overall, if not more. There are no outside threats.
In 2013, GBP/SHO had a 80-85% market share of the domestic PPV boxing industry, which is damn near monopolistic. Google, by comparison, has 90% of the search engine market. [EMPHASIS ADDED]


• Al Haymon Boxing adviser and promoter This shadowy ring adviser doesn’t speak to reporters; instead he’s wielded his enormous influence at HBO and Showtime by dangling the idea that his top fighter, Floyd Mayweather Jr., would sign with or leave them. The result: Haymon’s stable has collected millions fighting inferior opposition. The 57-year-old’s latest client, rising star Adrien Broner, ensures Haymon’s influence will continue. [http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/main/photos/1303/50-most-powerful-people-in-sports/42/]

Al Haymon• Haymon came to boxing in 2000 and worked initially with Vernon Forrest. He is licensed in Nevada as a manager, yet he also performs many of the same functions as a promoter. He received the Al Buck Award as manager of the year from the Boxing Writers Association of America in 2005, 2012 and 2013. Haymon’s biggest client is Floyd Mayweather Jr., whom he manages and helped maneuver out of his contract with Top Rank Boxing for $750,000. [Emphasis added, See [http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Al_Haymon], which also provides a partial list of boxers affiliated with Haymon, demonstrating his monopolistic market share]

• Haymon’s small inner circle entered the boxing world with him. Sylvia Browne, his assistant, handled much of the day-to-day affairs. Sam Watson and his two sons represented the public face of Haymon’s boxing enterprise, accompanying Haymon fighters into the ring.
Early on, Haymon tenaciously sought connections with the networks. He called Xavier James, the vice president for sports programming at HBO until 2004, at all hours daily, on three separate lines, and yet Haymon remained a mystery to James. Haymon penetrated boxing, James said, “with a great deal of guile and almost no personal interaction.”


If I wanted to,” James said Haymon often told him, “I could run boxing.” [Emphasis added, Al Haymon Quietly Shakes Up Boxing – NYTimes.com 12/18/11]

The California Court of Appeals issued a very recent decision reiterating the laws against monopolies in California, i.e. the Cartwright Act, California Crane School, Inc. v. National Comm. for Certification of Crane Operators (2014), Cal.App.4th [No. F063727. Fifth Dist. May 8, 2014.]. This court wrote that:

Section 16720 of the Cartwright Act defines an unlawful trust as “a combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more persons” for enumerated purposes that restrains trade. Section 16726 provides that “every trust is unlawful, against public policy and void.” Section 16750, subdivision (a), confers a private right of action on “[a]ny person who is injured in his … business or property by reason of anything forbidden or declared unlawful by this chapter ….” The Cartwright Act is patterned after the federal Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), so decisions under the Sherman Act are applicable under the Cartwright Act. ( Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co. (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 709 , 717 ( Kolling ).)
To state a cause of action under the Cartwright Act, appellants must allege (1) the formation and operation of a conspiracy, (2) illegal acts done pursuant thereto, and (3) damage proximately caused by the acts. (Kolling, supra, 137 Cal. App.3d at p. 717.) California requires a high degree of particularity in the pleading of Cartwright Act violations. To be sufficient, the complaint must allege specific conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy to reduce competition. (Marsh v. Anesthesia Services Medical Group, Inc (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 480, 493 (Marsh).)
The Cartwright Act prohibits combinations in unreasonable restraint of trade. Certain restraints, including some group boycotts, are conclusively presumed to be {Slip Opn. Page 53} unreasonable and illegal. (Marsh, supra , 200 Cal.App.4th at p. 493.) A vertical boycott consists of collaboration among business entities occupying different levels of distribution to deny a competitor at one level the benefits enjoyed by the members of the vertical combination. ( Id. at p. 494.)
Appellants assert they have alleged a third- party vertical boycott. That is, NCCCO, IAI and the unnamed co-conspirator crane schools conspired to boycott appellants from access to the essential testing services that are provided to other competing schools in the state. Appellants submit their allegations mirror those found to be sufficient in case law and the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers.
The antitrust plaintiff must delineate a relevant market and show that the defendant plays enough of a role in that market to impair competition significantly. (Exxon Corp., supra, 51 Cal.App.4th at p. 1682.) Market power is generally equated with market share. It is usually inferred from possession of a substantial percentage of the sales in a market that is carefully defined in terms of product and geography. (Redwood Theatres, Inc. v. Festival Enterprises, Inc . (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 687, 704.) The “relevant market” is composed of products that have reasonable interchangeability for the purpose for which they are produced. ( Exxon Corp., supra, 51 Cal.App.4th at p. 1682.) The relevant market may present a question of fact. (Ibid.) {Slip Opn. Page 68}

In another recent case Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc. (2010) 49 Cal.4th 758 the California Supreme Court made the point that the effect on market share or of market share causes injury.

Out in the Open


13) Defendant Al Haymon holds himself out to be a manager or advisor to professional boxers. In point of fact, as we will explain later in this complaint, he actually operates in the role of promoter. He is the owner of an entity named “Al Haymon Development, Inc.”
14) Golden Boy Promotions, Inc. is a major promoter of professional boxing. Its president is Oscar De La Hoya and its CEO is Richard Schaefer. It is common knowledge in the industry that Schaefer is attempting to wrest control of Golden Boy from De La Hoya who is, on information and belief, the majority shareholder.
15) Showtime is a pay television network whose Executive Vice President for Sports is Stephen Espinoza. It is the chief competitor to HBO, which is generally considered to be the leading pay network in the United States. Each of Showtime and HBO prominently features boxing on their respective networks.

Stephen Espinoza is an attorney who has put his California Bar Status as “inactive” since he moved to New York to run Showtime Sports. He used to be an attorney with Ziffren Brittenham LLP in Century City. While with Ziffren, Espinoza used to represent Oscar De La Hoya’s Golden Boy, which in essence means that he was then-representing De La Hoya’s interests as the majority stockholder.

On March 24, 2014, David Kassel wrote [http://fighthype.com/news/article16473.html]

Is Al Haymon planning something huge? Anyone who is anyone in the boxing and music industries are very familiar with Haymon. Like it or not, he is the most influential man in boxing. Yes, I believe Haymon is more influential than Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquiao, Richard Schaefer, Bob Arum, Ken Hershman, Stephen Espinoza, or anyone else affiliated with The Sweet Science. Haymon is the man whom Mayweather (boxing’s most prized possession) seeks advice from, and whatever Haymon suggests, Mayweather usually listens. Over the last few years, Haymon has slowly and steadily built his stable of fighters. However, within the last year, the list of fighters to join Al Haymon has been unbelievable. These past few weeks have been no exception as Haymon has signed the likes of: Adonis Stevenson, Amir Khan, Lamont and Anthony Peterson, Deontay Wilder, and Robert Guerrero. Add that to names like Mayweather, Danny Garcia, Leo Santa Cruz, Chris Arreola, Devon Alexander, Peter Quillin, Keith Thurman, Erislandy Lara, Austin Trout, Adrien Broner, Lucas Matthysse, Paulie Malignaggi, Omar Figueroa, and plenty of other world champions, and you have one hell of an army. Don’t just think Haymon signs world titlists either. Haymon also has a growing list of up-andS-coming prospects who are the future stars of boxing.

I have a feeling Al Haymon is planning something big, and I have a feeling both Golden Boy Promotions and Top Rank are going to feel the effects. Could Richard Schaefer be a part of the big Al Haymon picture? A couple weeks ago, rumors surfaced that Haymon could be working on forming a promotional entity with Schaefer, currently the Golden Boy Promotions CEO, becoming the face of the company. We all know that Sam Watson and his sons, Marcus and Brandon, are the current faces of Haymon fighters while Schaefer stands behind his Golden Boy fighters, but it’s no secret that Schaefer doesn’t always see eye-to-eye with Golden Boy Promotions founder Oscar De La Hoya. Couple that with De La Hoya’s personal problems and Schaefer may see this as an opportunity to move into the future with a man who has had a track record of nothing but success. Someone once asked me why Haymon doesn’t have his own promotional company already, and I answered by saying that it didn’t make sense at the time because Haymon didn’t have enough fighters to put together a full show, on a consistent basis, making it worth his while and paying the promotional fees associated with putting on a show. Now, he has everything he needs because of his big name fighters and his young crop of talent. I’m not buying into the rumors of a Haymon/Schaefer collaboration yet, but the more fighters who sign with Haymon, the more I believe a big announcement could be coming sooner rather than later. [Emphasis added]

So surprise, surprise, on June 3, 2014, ESPN announces [http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/11024103/floyd-mayweather-vows-stop-working-golden-boy-promotions-ceo-richard-schaefer-resigns] that:

Hours after Richard Schaefer’s Monday resignation as chief executive of Golden Boy Promotions following months of infighting with company co-founder/majority shareholder/president Oscar De La Hoya, pound-for-pound king Floyd Mayweather Jr. dumped the company.

Mayweather, whose fights generate the biggest pay-per-view numbers in the sport, has worked with Golden Boy on a fight-by-fight basis for all of his nine bouts since his 2007 blockbuster against De La Hoya, which set the all-time pay-per-view buy record at nearly 2.5 million subscriptions.

Interestingly enough, Schaefer never got Mayweather to commit to anything but one at a time deals with Golden Boy, so now Oscar De La Hoya is screwed as majority stockholder. This raises a series of questions since Schaefer as corporate CEO of Golden Boy has had an ongoing fiduciary duty to Golden Boy’s shareholders, especially its majority shareholder, De La Hoya. Was it impossible all these years that Schaefer was at the helm for him to convince Mayweather not to commit to a long term contract, or was Schaefer jockeying for the ideal situation for himself to bail out of Golden Boy if he lost his battle for control with De La Hoya and thereby align himself with the triumvirate of Haymon, Stephen Espinoza at Showtime, and himself?

That brings up a similar question. Showtime’s official online biography of Stephen Espinoza says that:

Prior to joining SHOWTIME, Espinoza was a partner in the firm of Ziffren Brittenham LLP. At the firm, he specialized in representing athletes and sports personalities, including professional boxers Oscar De La Hoya and Mike Tyson, who generated a total of over $500 million in pay-per-view revenues under his representation. Espinoza has served as lead counsel for De La Hoya’s Golden Boy Promotions since the formation of the company. Through his representation of Tyson, De La Hoya and Golden Boy Promotions, Espinoza has been directly involved in several of the highest-grossing pay-per-view boxing events in the history of the sport. Other notable former sports clients include former NFL star and current broadcaster Michael Strahan and mixed martial arts fighter Gina Carano.

So, what are Espinoza’s fiduciary duties to Oscar De La Hoya?

The California Bar Association has a couple of rules that Stephen Espinoza should be thinking about in the event that he has dealings with Schaefer and Haymon that are now against the interests of his former client, Oscar De La Hoya. First, Rule 3-300:

Rule 3-300 Avoiding Interests Adverse to a Client

A member shall not enter into a business transaction with a client; or knowingly acquire an ownership, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a client, unless each of the following requirements has been satisfied:

(A) The transaction or acquisition and its terms are fair and reasonable to the client and are fully disclosed and transmitted in writing to the client in a manner which should reasonably have been understood by the client; and

(B) The client is advised in writing that the client may seek the advice of an independent lawyer of the client’s choice and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek that advice; and

(C) The client thereafter consents in writing to the terms of the transaction or the terms of the acquisition.

Also, look at Rule 3-310:

Rule 3-310 Avoiding the Representation of Adverse Interests

(A) For purposes of this rule:

(1) “Disclosure” means informing the client or former client of the relevant circumstances and of the actual and reasonably foreseeable adverse consequences to the client or former client;

(2) “Informed written consent” means the client’s or former client’s written agreement to the representation following written disclosure;

(3) “Written” means any writing as defined in Evidence Code section 250.

(B) A member shall not accept or continue representation of a client without providing written disclosure to the client where:

(1) The member has a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with a party or witness in the same matter; or

(2) The member knows or reasonably should know that:

(a) the member previously had a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with a party or witness in the same matter; and

(b) the previous relationship would substantially affect the member’s representation; or

(3) The member has or had a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal relationship with another person or entity the member knows or reasonably should know would be affected substantially by resolution of the matter; or

(4) The member has or had a legal, business, financial, or professional interest in the subject matter of the representation.

(C) A member shall not, without the informed written consent of each client:

(1) Accept representation of more than one client in a matter in which the interests of the clients potentially conflict; or

(2) Accept or continue representation of more than one client in a matter in which the interests of the clients actually conflict; or

(3) Represent a client in a matter and at the same time in a separate matter accept as a client a person or entity whose interest in the first matter is adverse to the client in the first matter.

(D) A member who represents two or more clients shall not enter into an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against the clients without the informed written consent of each client.

(E) A member shall not, without the informed written consent of the client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client or former client where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has obtained confidential information material to the employment.

(F) A member shall not accept compensation for representing a client from one other than the client unless:

(1) There is no interference with the member’s independence of professional judgment or with the client-lawyer relationship; and

(2) Information relating to representation of the client is protected as required by Business and Professions Code section 6068, subdivision (e); and

(3) The member obtains the client’s informed written consent, provided that no disclosure or consent is required if:

(a) such nondisclosure is otherwise authorized by law; or

(b) the member is rendering legal services on behalf of any public agency which provides legal services to other public agencies or the public. [Emphasis added]

The bar probably meant when it wrote those rules that they applied specifically to “employment” as an attorney, but outside of the lawyer-client context the language I’ve given emphasis to above certainly gives guidance as to Espinoza’s independent common law fiduciary duty to Oscar De La Hoya. Will Stephen do something now as an employee of Showtime that is adverse to the interests of his former legal clients? Whether or not it’s legal, it’s certainly an ethical issue.

The latest intrigue

Frank Espinoza

Frank Espinoza

Boxing scene reported [http://www.boxingscene.com/mares-managerial-status-likely-land-arbitration–78752] this morning that there may be a move afoot for Abner Mares to switch over to the Al Haymon empire and this raises the spectre, like the scenario noted above in which Al Haymon purportedly orchestrated Floyd Mayweather away from Bob Arum’s Top Rank, in which Haymon steals Mares out from under Golden Boy and Frank Espinoza’s (no relation to Stephen Espinoza) Espinoza Boxing Club. As boxing scene wrote:

By Rick Reeno

Sources with knowledge of the details have advised BoxingScene.com that an arbitration proceeding, in Los Angeles, is a likely scenario to sort out the managerial contract of former three division world champion Abner Mares.

The Mexican Olympian recently stated that his contract with longtime manager Frank Espinoza had expired and he planned to explore his managerial options. Since the start of the year, there have been heavy rumblings that Mares was making a move to adviser/manager Al Haymon.

Since last August’s TKO defeat to Jhonny Gonzalez, Mares has turned down several fight offers and claimed injury to withdraw from a planned February rematch with Gonzalez. Those close to Espinoza believe that Mares was intentionally staying on the shelf in order to run out the clock on his managerial contract.

Because Mares claimed injury and rejected numerous fight offers, there is a heavy belief that Espinoza’s managerial contract would in turn be extended (at least for several months) to make up the time for Mares’ inactivity.

Mares is scheduled to face Jonathan Oquendo on the Canelo-Lara Showtime Pay-Per-View on July 12th in Las Vegas.

Espinoza gave a “no comment” when BoxingScene approached him with the information that his company, Espinoza Boxing Club, was already making moves to arbitrate the contract dispute with Mares.

Abner Mares

Abner Mares

Now as I understand the back-story about Mares’ alleged injuries, they supposedly occurred in Mexico while Richard Schaefer was of course, still CEO of Golden Boy and that his corporate “due diligence” and exercise of his corporate duties of “reasonable inquiry” and “loyalty” consisted of his sending Mares’ to see an American doctor after he quite belatedly returned from Mexico. The question in my mind is, did Schaefer bother to obtain the X-Rays, MRI, and/or CT Scans from the Mexican physician(s) that Mares initially saw immediately after the purported injury? If he did, did he share or withhold those records from the physician he sent Mares to in the United States, let alone did he let Frank Espinoza, Mares’ own manager, see those records. You know, inquiring minds just like to know these little details.

If Schaefer didn’t do those things, which logic dictates any ethical and conscientious corporate CEO would have done in these circumstances, it sure makes me think about the coincidence of Schaefer’s potentially helping run out the clock on Mares’ ties to Frank Espinoza and Golden Boy until right around the time that he himself was going to bail out, amongst all the talk of whether he was going more overtly into a triumvirate with Haymon and Stephen Espinoza.

Yeah, a coincidence!



Posted in Ideas & Opinions, Private Investigation Industry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

AB1839 Amendments needed


CALLAC ltr AB 1839_001 CALLAC ltr AB 1839_002 CALLAC ltr AB 1839_002CALLAC ltr AB 1839_003

Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gay Man of Courage


HS Principal’s Coming Out as Gay Was ‘So Unexpected’

By YAZHOU SUN | Good Morning America – Thu, Jun 5, 2014 3:06 PM EDT


Woodrow Wilson High School principal Pete Cahall stunned many of his D.C. students when he came out during the school’s gay pride celebration.

“That was so unexpected,” gay school senior Tao Marwell told ABC News affiliate station WJLA-TV in Washington. “I had no idea. I have so much more respect for him now.”

His hands trembling, his voice shaking, his speech stuttered, Cahall confessed something Wednesday he said he had waited many years to say publicly.

“I am a proud gay man that just happens to be the principal of Wilson High School,” he said as students cheered and clapped, according to WJLA.

It all unfolded at the school’s second annual gay pride celebration during Wednesday’s lunch hour. When Cahall was handed the microphone, he looked overwhelmed and uneasy, WJLA reported.

He said he had only told a small circle of friends about his sexuality, not even his family.

“I have been in the shadows, but I am liberated today,” Cahall told the audience. “I have not made this declaration before, because I did not want my kids [the students] to think differently, or not respect me.”

Cahall said the fears were obstacles in his mind because of the culture of when and where he grew up, not providing any details.

After the announcement at the LGBT event, Cahall was still shaking as students walked up to offer him hugs, WJLA said.

Cahall has not responded to ABC News’ request for comment.

Human Rights Campaign director Ellen Kahn said, “What he did was very bold and courageous.”

LGBT students are consistently bullied because of their identifies, both verbally and physically, she said. “He is in a high school where some students probably already find themselves to be attracted by the same sex, or have claimed to be a group of LGBT,” Kahn added. “When an adult comes out, it delivers a very powerful message.”

But not everyone welcomed the news.

Westboro Baptist Church, a Topeka, Kansas, organization known for anti-gay picketing at military funerals, plans to protest Wilson’s Pride Day Monday.

“You should be hanging your heads in shame for such a thing,” the church declared on its website regarding the gay pride event. “Since your teachers haven’t taught you the basic lesson of why God destroyed Sodom, we’ll help you out.”

Nearly 1,000 Wilson students have signed up for a peaceful counter-protest Monday.

D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray. who tweeted that the school has his full support, called Westboro church “backward thinking” and its message “a disgrace.”

“In my best biblical reference,” Gray said, “they can go straight to hell.”

Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tucker’s precinct operation


Norma Ramirez

Norma Ramirez

I can’t thank Norma Ramirez and her family, friends and cohorts for her impressive grass roots precinct operation to promote my write-in campaign in my hometown of Arleta, California.  Arleta was considered a backwater when I was growing up:  it was so unknown and non-descript that the Post Office used to accidentally send mail addressed to Arleta to Goleta up in Santa Barbara County.  Nowadays lo and behold, we have two of my Arleta homies, Felipe Fuentes as City Council member and Alex Padilla who just placed first in the 2014 primary election for Secretary of State.

Anyway, here are the photos of Norma et al’s campaign efforts from my old barrio:

10449529_10204029868174921_1764800286641295507_n 10418167_10204029867854913_7764933105774221519_n 10410986_10204029866974891_6743422147290788420_n 10367177_10204029825653858_5898412841036906797_n 10372574_10204029830493979_2176136374355139836_n 10377027_10204029293320550_8055886378737525934_n 10349209_10204029827493904_8681547949465074891_n 10361029_10204029832214022_620709764346890109_n 10366019_10204029831694009_4224412689421763951_n 10334268_10204029867614907_3145629498301207602_n

































































Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Dracula – Blacula Resurrection Party 6-8-14


This will be our 2nd Annual Dracula/Blacula Ressurection event (last year: http://janbtucker.com/blog/2013/04/30/draculablacula-resurrection-party-5-25-13/ ).

Gyula Tamas Zubovicz aka Dracula

Gyula Tamas Zubovicz aka Dracula

The last weekend in May 1997, Gyula Tamas Zubovicz (the Dracula of the Dracula Crime Family of the Hungarian Mafia) was murdered on the orders of Semion Mogilevich (head of the Red Mafiya), but he survived having his legs blown off, only to be poisoned in his hospital bed. However, nobody cut off his head, put a stake through his heart, or dragged him out into the sunlight. We had him buried in Transylvanian Earth, so he is just resting until he gets better.

William Marshall, the actor who played Blacula, died June 5, 2003.  From Wikipedia:

William Marshall--Blacula, long time member of the Peace & Freedom Party, Black Panther supporter

William Marshall–Blacula, long time member of the Peace & Freedom Party, Black Panther supporter

Blacula is a 1972 American blaxploitation horror film produced for American International Pictures.[1] It was directed by William Crain and stars William Marshall in the title role about an 18th-century African prince named Mamuwalde, who is turned into a vampire and later locked in a coffin by Count Dracula. Two centuries later, the now-undead Mamuwalde rises from his coffin attacking various residents in modern day Los Angeles. Mamuwalde later meets Tina (Vonetta McGee), a woman he believes to be the reincarnation of his deceased wife Luva.

Blacula was released to mixed reviews in the United States, but was one of the top grossing films of the year. It was the first film to receive an award for Best Horror Film at the Saturn Awards. Blacula was followed by the sequel Scream Blacula Scream in 1973 and inspired a small wave of blaxploitation themed horror films.

Jan Tucker aka Tokar Janos Von Erdelyi's Ring of Dracula

Jan Tucker aka Tokar Janos Von Erdelyi’s Ring of Dracula

The only person who knew both Dracula and Blacula is Jan B. Tucker, who wears the ring of Dracula, cast from the original mold from which Bela Lugosi’s ring was made.

Join us for the annual Dracula party, which last year was renamed to include our brother Blacula for the 10th anniversary of his going to the land of dead, so that we can resurrect them into the land of the undead by consuming BBQ Blutwurst (Body of Dracula) and Vampire Label Red Wine imported from Transylvania (Blood of Dracula) as the sacraments of resurrection.

Additionally, my dear friend Bobbee Zeno who departed to the land of the dead recently, was also an old friend of Blacula and had been looking forward to attending this event, so we will honor Bobbee Z with a toast to his spirit in hopes that he communes with us at the party!

Potluck–email for suggestions, evil@janbtucker.com

Posted in Anecdotes & Adventures, Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Zoot Suit Riots Feted 6-11-14 @ ELA



Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Endorse me for Board of Equalization


If you support me in my run for Third District, California Board of Equalization please come out of your closet and authorize me to publicly list you as an endorser.  Email me your approval, how you want your name listed, and what title or occupation to list for you, like the ones below, at pr@janbtucker.com, or use the contact form at the bottom.  For info on how to Write In my name on the ballot:  http://janbtucker.com/blog/2014/05/06/how-to-write-in-jan-b-tucker-for-board-of-equalization/

NEWS FLASH 6-1-14 @ 5:00 P.M.

I have just learned in a desperation last minute smear campaign, PFP State Chair Kevin Akin called one of my prominent supporters and threatened political retaliation if she did not withdraw her endorsement of me.  I ask my supporters to contact the candidate (Eric S. Moren) on whose behalf Akin is making these calls and ask him to repudiate these despicable tactics and call Akin himself and demand that he cease and desist:

ERIC S. MOREN (805) 602-7175 (Business) E-MAIL:  morenseric@gmail.com

PHONE: (909) 787-0318
E-MAIL: kevinakin1950@hotmail.com


Posted in Ideas & Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment